TSTP Solution File: GRP474-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : GRP474-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:00:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 21
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 36 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 35 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 101 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)),divide(X4,X3)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yUBYtZGT5y/E---3.1_8474.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yUBYtZGT5y/E---3.1_8474.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yUBYtZGT5y/E---3.1_8474.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(X3,X4),X1)),divide(X4,X3)) = X2,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
divide(divide(inverse(X1),divide(divide(X2,X3),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X1)),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4)))),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(X6,X5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(divide(X2,X1),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X3)),divide(divide(X5,X6),X4))))) = divide(X5,X6),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(X3,X1)),divide(divide(X4,X5),divide(inverse(divide(X6,X3)),divide(divide(X5,X4),X6)))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(divide(divide(X3,X4),divide(inverse(divide(X5,X6)),divide(divide(X4,X3),X5))),X1)),X6) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(divide(X2,X1),divide(inverse(divide(X4,X3)),divide(X5,X4))))) = X5,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(divide(inverse(X1),divide(X2,divide(inverse(divide(X3,X1)),divide(X4,X3)))),X5)),X4),X2) = X5,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
divide(divide(inverse(divide(X1,X2)),divide(X2,X1)),divide(X3,X4)) = divide(X4,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(divide(X3,X4)),divide(X4,X3))) = divide(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(X2,X1))) = X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(inverse(X3),divide(X2,X3))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3),inverse(X3)) = inverse(divide(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3))) = divide(inverse(divide(X3,X2)),inverse(inverse(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
divide(X1,divide(inverse(divide(X2,X3)),inverse(inverse(inverse(X2))))) = inverse(divide(X3,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
divide(X1,divide(inverse(divide(X2,X3)),divide(X3,X2))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X1))),inverse(divide(X1,X2))) = inverse(X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
divide(inverse(X1),inverse(divide(X1,inverse(X2)))) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
divide(inverse(inverse(X1)),inverse(X2)) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
divide(inverse(X1),inverse(divide(X1,X2))) = inverse(X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
divide(X1,inverse(divide(divide(X2,X3),inverse(divide(X3,X2))))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
divide(inverse(divide(divide(X1,X2),X3)),divide(X2,X1)) = X3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_14]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
inverse(divide(X1,X2)) = divide(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
divide(divide(X1,divide(X2,X3)),divide(X3,X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,inverse(divide(b3,inverse(c3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_28]),c_0_28]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,X2)) = divide(X1,X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_6]),c_0_3]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),divide(X3,divide(X2,X1))) = inverse(X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
divide(divide(a3,inverse(b3)),inverse(c3)) != divide(a3,divide(inverse(c3),b3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
divide(divide(X1,X2),X3) = divide(X1,divide(X3,inverse(X2))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_7]),c_0_26]),c_0_26]),c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : GRP474-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.04/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.yUBYtZGT5y/E---3.1_8474.p
% 0.15/0.45 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # new_bool_1 with pid 8554 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 8559 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Result found by U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45 # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.15/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.45 # Processed clauses : 107
% 0.15/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 38
% 0.15/0.45 # ...subsumed : 20
% 0.15/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 49
% 0.15/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 37
% 0.15/0.45 # Generated clauses : 3223
% 0.15/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2894
% 0.15/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Paramodulations : 3223
% 0.15/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 3195
% 0.15/0.45 # ...of those cached : 2091
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2757
% 0.15/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 2757
% 0.15/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 40
% 0.15/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.15/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 246
% 0.15/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 43
% 0.15/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 51663
% 0.15/0.45 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 # User time : 0.044 s
% 0.15/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.45 # Total time : 0.048 s
% 0.15/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 # User time : 0.046 s
% 0.15/0.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.45 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.15/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------