TSTP Solution File: GRP467-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP467-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:43:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 0.65s
% Output   : Refutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GRP467-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 02:08:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Tue Jun 14 02:08:24 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25396.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.20/0.37  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} multiply(A,B)=divide(A,inverse(B)).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 16
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.20/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.20/0.40     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.20/0.40     distinct function count: 3
% 0.20/0.40     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.45/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.25 sec ----> 453 [binary,451.1,432.1] {-} $F.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Length of proof is 12.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.45/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/0.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  1 [] {+} multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2)!=a2.
% 0.45/0.65  2 [] {-} divide(divide(A,A),divide(B,divide(divide(C,divide(D,B)),inverse(D))))=C.
% 0.45/0.65  4 [] {+} multiply(A,B)=divide(A,inverse(B)).
% 0.45/0.65  6 [copy,4,flip.1] {+} divide(A,inverse(B))=multiply(A,B).
% 0.45/0.65  7 [para_into,2.1.1.2.2.1.2,2.1.1] {-} divide(divide(A,A),divide(divide(B,divide(divide(C,divide(D,B)),inverse(D))),divide(divide(E,C),inverse(divide(F,F)))))=E.
% 0.45/0.65  9 [para_into,2.1.1.2.2.1,2.1.1] {+} divide(divide(A,A),divide(divide(divide(B,divide(C,D)),inverse(C)),divide(B,inverse(D))))=divide(E,E).
% 0.45/0.65  67 [para_from,6.1.1,2.1.1.2.2] {-} divide(divide(A,A),divide(B,multiply(divide(C,divide(D,B)),D)))=C.
% 0.45/0.65  184 [para_into,9.1.1,9.1.1] {+} divide(A,A)=divide(B,B).
% 0.45/0.65  231 [para_into,184.1.1,6.1.1] {+} multiply(inverse(A),A)=divide(B,B).
% 0.45/0.65  246,245 [para_from,184.1.1,7.1.1.2.2.1] {-} divide(divide(A,A),divide(divide(B,divide(divide(C,divide(D,B)),inverse(D))),divide(divide(E,E),inverse(divide(F,F)))))=C.
% 0.45/0.65  248 [para_from,184.1.1,67.1.1.2.2.1] {-} divide(divide(A,A),divide(B,multiply(divide(C,C),D)))=divide(D,B).
% 0.45/0.65  275 [para_into,248.1.1,184.1.1] {-} divide(A,A)=divide(B,multiply(divide(C,C),B)).
% 0.45/0.65  280 [copy,275,flip.1] {-} divide(A,multiply(divide(B,B),A))=divide(C,C).
% 0.45/0.65  432 [para_from,231.1.1,1.1.1.1] {+} multiply(divide(A,A),a2)!=a2.
% 0.45/0.65  451 [para_from,280.1.1,7.1.1.2.2.1,demod,246] {-} multiply(divide(A,A),B)=B.
% 0.45/0.65  453 [binary,451.1,432.1] {-} $F.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.45/0.65  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  ============ end of search ============
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  true clauses given           7      (38.9%)
% 0.45/0.65  false clauses given         11
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.45/0.65     7  0         1
% 0.45/0.65     8  0         2
% 0.45/0.65    12  2         0
% 0.45/0.65    15  5         0
% 0.45/0.65    16  10        0
% 0.45/0.65    17  4         2
% 0.45/0.65    18  1         0
% 0.45/0.65    19  8         4
% 0.45/0.65    20  10        14
% 0.45/0.65    21  3         18
% 0.45/0.65    22  0         8
% 0.45/0.65    23  2         0
% 0.45/0.65    24  7         0
% 0.45/0.65    25  11        14
% 0.45/0.65    26  5         8
% 0.45/0.65    27  0         2
% 0.45/0.65    29  17        6
% 0.45/0.65    30  16        10
% 0.45/0.65    31  7         4
% 0.45/0.65    33  3         4
% 0.45/0.65    34  12        10
% 0.45/0.65    35  4         17
% 0.45/0.65    36  1         0
% 0.45/0.65    38  3         0
% 0.45/0.65    39  10        4
% 0.45/0.65    40  2         2
% 0.45/0.65    43  1         2
% 0.45/0.65    44  8         4
% 0.45/0.65    48  2         2
% 0.45/0.65    49  1         0
% 0.45/0.65    53  1         0
% 0.45/0.65  tot:  156       138      (46.9% true)
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.45/0.65  
% 0.45/0.65  Process 25396 finished Tue Jun 14 02:08:25 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------