%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GRP460-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:22:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    identity != identity,
    inference(superposition,[],[f6,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : identity = divide(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    identity != divide(divide(identity,a1),divide(identity,a1)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f5,f2,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : inverse(X0) = divide(identity,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : multiply(X0,X1) = divide(X0,divide(identity,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    identity != multiply(inverse(a1),a1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GRP460-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 22:41:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.48  % (18197)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Time elapsed: 0.058 s
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (18205)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (18182)Success in time 0.144 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------