TSTP Solution File: GRP458-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP458-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:41:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 16 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(divide(identity,X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JErZ2Sd5Ef/E---3.1_20791.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(identity,axiom,
identity = divide(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JErZ2Sd5Ef/E---3.1_20791.p',identity) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
multiply(identity,a2) != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JErZ2Sd5Ef/E---3.1_20791.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(identity,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JErZ2Sd5Ef/E---3.1_20791.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(divide(identity,X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
identity = divide(X1,X1),
identity ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
divide(divide(identity,divide(X1,divide(X2,divide(divide(identity,X1),X3)))),X3) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
divide(divide(identity,divide(X1,identity)),X2) = divide(divide(identity,X1),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
divide(divide(identity,divide(identity,divide(X1,divide(identity,X2)))),X2) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
divide(identity,divide(X1,identity)) = divide(identity,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
divide(divide(identity,divide(identity,X1)),identity) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
multiply(identity,a2) != a2,
prove_these_axioms_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(identity,X2)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
divide(X1,identity) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]),c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
divide(identity,divide(identity,a2)) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
divide(identity,divide(identity,X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09 % Problem : GRP458-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:04:37 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JErZ2Sd5Ef/E---3.1_20791.p
% 0.15/0.40 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 20869 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 20873 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Result found by Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.40 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.40 # Starting Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.40 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.40 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.15/0.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/0.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.15/0.40 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.40 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.15/0.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.15/0.40 # Generated clauses : 40
% 0.15/0.40 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
% 0.15/0.40 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Paramodulations : 40
% 0.15/0.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Total rewrite steps : 32
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.15/0.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.15/0.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.15/0.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 568
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1548 pages
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.40 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.15/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------