TSTP Solution File: GRP452-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : GRP452-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:15:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.83s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : GRP452-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 22:37:07 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.83/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.83/1.19  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.83/1.19  original problem:
% 0.83/1.19  axioms:
% 0.83/1.19  divide(divide(divide(A, A), divide(A, divide(B, divide(divide(divide(A, A), A), C)))), C) = B
% 0.83/1.19  multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 0.83/1.19  inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 0.83/1.19  goal:
% 0.83/1.19  multiply(multiply(inverse(b2()), b2()), a2()) != a2()
% 0.83/1.19  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.83/1.19  it suffices to show that multiply(multiply(inverse(b2()), b2()), a2()) = a2() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.83/1.19  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.83/1.19  0: divide(divide(divide(X0, X0), divide(X0, divide(X1, divide(divide(divide(X0, X0), X0), X2)))), X2) = X1.
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  1: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, divide(divide(X2, X2), X1)).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  2: inverse(X0) = divide(divide(X1, X1), X0).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  3: divide(inverse(divide(X0, divide(X1, divide(inverse(X0), X2)))), X2) = X1.
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite equation 0,
% 0.83/1.19                 lhs with equations [2,2]
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  4: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, inverse(X1)).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite equation 1,
% 0.83/1.19                 lhs with equations []
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  10: divide(X3, X3) = divide(inverse(divide(X0, inverse(divide(inverse(X0), X2)))), X2).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 3 and 2.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  12: X1 = divide(inverse(divide(divide(X3, divide(X4, divide(inverse(X3), X5))), divide(X1, X4))), X5).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 3 and 3.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  13: inverse(divide(X3, divide(X4, divide(inverse(X3), divide(inverse(X0), X2))))) = divide(inverse(divide(X0, X4)), X2).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 3 and 3.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  14: X1 = inverse(divide(X3, divide(divide(X1, X4), divide(inverse(X3), X4)))).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite equation 12,
% 0.83/1.19                 lhs with equations []
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [13,3].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  16: X5 = inverse(divide(X3, inverse(divide(inverse(X3), X5)))).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 14 and 2.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  23: X6 = divide(divide(inverse(divide(X7, X6)), X8), divide(inverse(X7), X8)).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 3 and 13.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  33: divide(X3, X3) = divide(X2, X2).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite equation 10,
% 0.83/1.19                 lhs with equations []
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [16].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  38: inverse(divide(X1, X1)) = divide(X5, X5).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 33.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  42: inverse(X3) = inverse(divide(X3, divide(X6, X6))).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 14 and 33.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  44: X6 = inverse(divide(inverse(X7), inverse(divide(X7, X6)))).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 23 and 2.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  59: X8 = inverse(divide(inverse(X8), divide(X9, X9))).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: A critical pair between equations 44 and 38.
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  65: X8 = inverse(inverse(X8)).
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite equation 59,
% 0.83/1.19                 lhs with equations []
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [42].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  73: multiply(multiply(inverse(b2()), b2()), a2()) = a2().
% 0.83/1.19  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [4,4,2,65]
% 0.83/1.19                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.83/1.19  
% 0.83/1.19  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------