TSTP Solution File: GRP446-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : GRP446-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.81s 3.88s
% Output : Proof 3.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP446-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 03:53:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 3.81/3.88 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.81/3.88 % SZS output start Proof
% 3.81/3.88 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(divide(A, A), A), C))) = B
% 3.81/3.88 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 3.81/3.88 multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2) = a2 ==> \bottom
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 This holds because
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 E:
% 3.81/3.88 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(divide(A, A), A), C))) = B
% 3.81/3.88 f1(a2) = false__
% 3.81/3.88 f1(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)) = true__
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 3.81/3.88 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 3.81/3.88 G:
% 3.81/3.88 true__ = false__
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 This holds because
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(X0, divide(g1, Y0))) = divide(g1, X0)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(divide(A, A), A), C))) -> B
% 3.81/3.88 divide(X0, X0) -> g2
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(divide(X0, Y2), divide(divide(g1, Y0), Y2))) -> divide(g1, X0)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(divide(g1, Y1), divide(g1, Y0))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, Y0), X0))) -> divide(g1, X0)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0))) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, divide(inverse(Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> g2
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(Y1, g1) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, X0), divide(divide(g1, Y1), X0)) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, X0), divide(g1, divide(X0, Y1))) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, Y0), divide(divide(g1, Y2), divide(Y0, Y2))) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, Y0), divide(g1, divide(Y0, divide(g1, Y1)))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, Y1)), Y1) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0))), divide(divide(g1, Y2), divide(Y0, Y2))) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0))), divide(g1, divide(Y0, divide(g1, Y1)))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0))), divide(g1, divide(Y0, g1))) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y2))), divide(divide(g1, Y1), Y2)) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(g1, divide(Y1, divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y1)))))) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(g1, divide(divide(Y1, Y2), divide(g1, Y2))) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(g1, divide(divide(divide(g1, Y1), Y2), divide(g1, Y2))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0)) -> Y0
% 3.81/3.88 divide(g2, A) -> divide(g1, A)
% 3.81/3.88 divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X0))), divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(X0, Y2))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X0))), inverse(divide(X0, inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 f1(a2) -> false__
% 3.81/3.88 f1(divide(g1, divide(g1, a2))) -> true__
% 3.81/3.88 f1(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)) -> true__
% 3.81/3.88 g2 -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(Y1) -> divide(g1, Y1)
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(divide(X0, X0)) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y0), Y1), divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X0, X0))), Y1))) -> Y0
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(divide(inverse(Y1), divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X0, X0))), Y1))) -> g2
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(g1) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X0, X0))), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 3.81/3.88 inverse(inverse(g1)) -> g1
% 3.81/3.88 multiply(A, B) -> divide(A, divide(g2, B))
% 3.81/3.88 true__ -> false__
% 3.81/3.88 with the LPO induced by
% 3.81/3.88 b2 > multiply > inverse > divide > g2 > g1 > a2 > f1 > true__ > false__
% 3.81/3.88
% 3.81/3.88 % SZS output end Proof
% 3.81/3.88
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------