TSTP Solution File: GRP433-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP433-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:48:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  29 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (  28 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),X1),X2),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.f5j1DbMtDz/E---3.1_7292.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.f5j1DbMtDz/E---3.1_7292.p',prove_these_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),X1),X2),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(X1,multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X2,X3),X1)),X2)),X3),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = multiply(X5,inverse(X5)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(X2,inverse(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))),X2),X3),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = inverse(multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(multiply(X3,inverse(X3))))),X1),X2)) = multiply(X4,inverse(X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))),X2),inverse(X2))) = multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),inverse(multiply(X2,inverse(X2)))),X3),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = inverse(X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X3)))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),X2)),X3),inverse(X3)),multiply(X4,inverse(X4)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)))),X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),X2))))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)))))) = inverse(multiply(a1,inverse(a1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    inverse(inverse(multiply(a1,inverse(a1)))) = multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1))) = multiply(a1,inverse(a1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_16]),c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,multiply(a1,inverse(a1)))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(a1,inverse(a1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),X1),X2),multiply(multiply(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X4,X5),X6)),X4),X5),multiply(X7,inverse(X7))),X6))) = X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(inverse(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)),X1),X2)) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_4]),c_0_17]),c_0_16]),c_0_21]),c_0_4]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X1)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(X1,inverse(X1)))),X2),inverse(X2)) = multiply(X3,inverse(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1),
    prove_these_axioms_1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = multiply(inverse(X2),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GRP433-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:23:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.f5j1DbMtDz/E---3.1_7292.p
% 0.21/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 7377 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 7382 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 145
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.21/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 94
% 0.21/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 38
% 0.21/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 0.21/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 3246
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3062
% 0.21/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 3246
% 0.21/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1826
% 0.21/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.21/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.21/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.21/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2849
% 0.21/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2849
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.21/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.21/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 223
% 0.21/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 115
% 0.21/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 63543
% 0.21/0.55  
% 0.21/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55  # User time                : 0.054 s
% 0.21/0.55  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Total time               : 0.061 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1508 pages
% 0.21/0.55  
% 0.21/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55  # User time                : 0.291 s
% 0.21/0.55  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Total time               : 0.305 s
% 0.21/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------