TSTP Solution File: GRP403-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP403-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:18:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.44s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP403-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 02:14:17 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.44 Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.45 Axiom 1 (single_axiom): multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))) = Z.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Lemma 2: inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), W)), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))) = multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(W), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))).
% 0.21/0.45 Proof:
% 0.21/0.45 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), W)), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.45 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), W)), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.45 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(W), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))))
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Lemma 3: multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(Z), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))))) = Z.
% 0.21/0.45 Proof:
% 0.21/0.45 multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(Z), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by lemma 2 R->L }
% 0.21/0.45 multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), W)), Z)), inverse(multiply(W, multiply(inverse(W), W))))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.45 Z
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Lemma 4: inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), W))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))) = W.
% 0.21/0.45 Proof:
% 0.21/0.45 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), W))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by lemma 2 }
% 0.21/0.45 multiply(X, inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), W)), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))))
% 0.21/0.45 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) }
% 0.21/0.46 W
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Lemma 5: inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, Z))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))) = Z.
% 0.21/0.46 Proof:
% 0.21/0.46 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, Z))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), U)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), X))), inverse(multiply(U, multiply(inverse(U), U))))), Z))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), U)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), X))), inverse(multiply(U, multiply(inverse(U), U))))), Y)), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), U)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), X))), inverse(multiply(U, multiply(inverse(U), U))))), Z))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.21/0.46 Z
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Lemma 6: multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y)))) = Z.
% 0.21/0.46 Proof:
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by axiom 1 (single_axiom) R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))), inverse(multiply(Y, multiply(inverse(Y), Y))))), inverse(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, inverse(Z))), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))))))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(multiply(inverse(Z), inverse(multiply(multiply(X, inverse(Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, inverse(Z))), multiply(X, inverse(Z)))))))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.21/0.46 Z
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_1): multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = multiply(inverse(b1), b1).
% 0.21/0.46 Proof:
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(a1), a1)
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(a1), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(a1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(a1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(a1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(a1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(X, Y)), inverse(a1)))), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), inverse(b1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), inverse(b1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))), inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))), multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))))))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 3 }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), inverse(b1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z))))), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), inverse(b1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(b1), multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), Z)), multiply(inverse(multiply(W, V)), inverse(b1)))), inverse(multiply(Z, multiply(inverse(Z), Z)))))
% 0.21/0.46 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.21/0.46 multiply(inverse(b1), b1)
% 0.21/0.46 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------