TSTP Solution File: GRP403-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GRP403-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:18:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.12s 2.38s
% Output   : Refutation 2.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GRP403-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 11:02:14 EDT 2022
% 0.22/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 2.12/2.38  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 2.12/2.38  Process 21971 was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 2.12/2.38  Tue Jun 14 11:02:14 2022
% 2.12/2.38  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_21817_n013.cluster.edu".
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_21817_n013.cluster.edu
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.12/2.38  set(auto2).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 2.12/2.38      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 2.12/2.38      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 2.12/2.38      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 2.12/2.38  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 2.12/2.38  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 2.12/2.38  assign(order,kbo).
% 2.12/2.38  set(lex_order_vars).
% 2.12/2.38  clear(print_given).
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (2 formulas)
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  Auto_denials:
% 2.12/2.38    % copying label prove_these_axioms_1 to answer in negative clause
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  Term ordering decisions:
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % Assigning unary symbol inverse kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (5).
% 2.12/2.38  Function symbol KB weights:  a1=1. b1=1. multiply=1. inverse=0.
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 2.12/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.12/2.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % Proof 1 at 1.34 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_these_axioms_1.
% 2.12/2.38  % Length of proof is 18.
% 2.12/2.38  % Level of proof is 10.
% 2.12/2.38  % Maximum clause weight is 63.000.
% 2.12/2.38  % Given clauses 39.
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  1 multiply(A,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),C)),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B)))))) = C # label(single_axiom) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 2.12/2.38  2 multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != multiply(inverse(b1),b1) # label(prove_these_axioms_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [assumption].
% 2.12/2.38  3 multiply(inverse(b1),b1) != multiply(inverse(a1),a1) # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [copy(2),flip(a)].
% 2.12/2.38  4 multiply(A,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(B),C)),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,D)),B)),inverse(multiply(D,multiply(inverse(D),D))))),multiply(inverse(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,D)),B)),inverse(multiply(D,multiply(inverse(D),D)))))),inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,D)),B)),inverse(multiply(D,multiply(inverse(D),D))))))))))) = C.  [para(1(a,1),1(a,1,2,1,1,1,1,1))].
% 2.12/2.38  5 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),C)),D)),inverse(multiply(C,multiply(inverse(C),C))))) = multiply(A,inverse(multiply(inverse(D),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B)))))).  [para(1(a,1),1(a,1,2,1,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 2.12/2.38  17 multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),multiply(A,inverse(multiply(inverse(C),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B))))))) = C.  [para(5(a,1),1(a,1,2))].
% 2.12/2.38  43 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(A),B)),multiply(inverse(A),C))),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B))))) = C.  [para(5(a,2),4(a,1)),rewrite([1(11)])].
% 2.12/2.38  95 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(A),B)),multiply(inverse(A),C)) = multiply(inverse(multiply(D,B)),multiply(D,C)).  [para(43(a,1),17(a,1,2,2)),flip(a)].
% 2.12/2.38  96 inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),multiply(A,C))),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B))))) = C.  [para(43(a,1),43(a,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)),rewrite([43(15)])].
% 2.12/2.38  145 multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),multiply(A,C)) = multiply(inverse(multiply(D,B)),multiply(D,C)).  [para(95(a,1),95(a,1))].
% 2.12/2.38  172 multiply(A,inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,multiply(B,C))),D)),inverse(multiply(multiply(B,C),multiply(inverse(multiply(E,C)),multiply(E,C))))))) = D.  [para(145(a,1),1(a,1,2,1,2,1,2))].
% 2.12/2.38  226 multiply(inverse(multiply(A,inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B))))),multiply(A,C)) = multiply(D,multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(E,B)),multiply(E,D))),C)).  [para(96(a,1),145(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 2.12/2.38  939 inverse(multiply(A,multiply(inverse(A),A))) = multiply(inverse(multiply(B,A)),inverse(multiply(C,inverse(multiply(multiply(B,C),multiply(inverse(multiply(D,C)),multiply(D,C))))))).  [para(96(a,1),172(a,1,2,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 2.12/2.38  1137 multiply(A,multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(B,C)),multiply(B,A))),D)) = multiply(E,multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(F,C)),multiply(F,E))),D)).  [para(96(a,1),226(a,1,1))].
% 2.12/2.38  3326 multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(A,B)),multiply(A,inverse(C)))),inverse(multiply(B,multiply(inverse(B),B)))) = C.  [para(939(a,2),17(a,1,2))].
% 2.12/2.38  3716 multiply(inverse(A),A) = multiply(B,multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(C,D)),multiply(C,B))),inverse(multiply(D,multiply(inverse(D),D))))).  [para(3326(a,1),1137(a,1,2))].
% 2.12/2.38  4162 multiply(A,multiply(inverse(multiply(inverse(multiply(B,C)),multiply(B,A))),inverse(multiply(C,multiply(inverse(C),C))))) != multiply(inverse(a1),a1) # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [para(3716(a,1),3(a,1))].
% 2.12/2.38  4163 $F # answer(prove_these_axioms_1).  [resolve(4162,a,3716,a(flip))].
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  Given=39. Generated=11076. Kept=4161. proofs=1.
% 2.12/2.38  Usable=35. Sos=3481. Demods=1288. Limbo=6, Disabled=640. Hints=0.
% 2.12/2.38  Megabytes=16.51.
% 2.12/2.38  User_CPU=1.34, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=2.
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  ============================== end of search =========================
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  THEOREM PROVED
% 2.12/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 2.12/2.38  
% 2.12/2.38  Process 21971 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jun 14 11:02:16 2022
% 2.12/2.38  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------