TSTP Solution File: GRP402-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP402-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:06:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP402-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 12:00:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.42 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.42 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.42 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.42 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.42 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.42 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.42 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.42 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.42 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.42 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.43 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiply(X1,multiply(X2,commutator(X2,X1)))=multiply(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiply(commutator(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X3,commutator(X1,X2)))).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (commutator(commutator(a,b),c)!=commutator(a,commutator(b,c)))).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X1=X2|multiply(X3,X1)!=multiply(X3,X2))).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|multiply(X1,X3)!=multiply(X2,X3))).
% 0.19/0.43 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.43 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43 # Found 4 steps
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (commutator(commutator(a,b),c)!=commutator(a,commutator(b,c))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (commutator(commutator(a,b),c)!=commutator(a,commutator(b,c))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (multiply(commutator(commutator(a,b),c),X8)!=multiply(commutator(a,commutator(b,c)),X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.19/0.43 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (multiply(X7,multiply(commutator(commutator(a,b),c),X8))!=multiply(X7,multiply(commutator(a,commutator(b,c)),X8))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_19, ...])).
% 0.19/0.43 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.43 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.43 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.43 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.43 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.43 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.43 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.43 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------