TSTP Solution File: GRP401-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : GRP401-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:06:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP401-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 13:14:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.12/0.37 #
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6
% 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.38 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.38 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.38 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.38 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3)=multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiply(X1,multiply(X2,commutator(X2,X1)))=multiply(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiply(commutator(X1,X2),commutator(X3,X2))=commutator(multiply(X1,X3),X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (multiply(commutator(a,b),c)!=multiply(c,commutator(a,b)))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (X1=X2|multiply(X3,X1)!=multiply(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=X2|multiply(X1,X3)!=multiply(X2,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (multiply(commutator(a,b),c)!=multiply(c,commutator(a,b))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (multiply(commutator(a,b),c)!=multiply(c,commutator(a,b))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (multiply(multiply(commutator(a,b),c),X8)!=multiply(multiply(c,commutator(a,b)),X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (multiply(X7,multiply(multiply(commutator(a,b),c),X8))!=multiply(X7,multiply(multiply(c,commutator(a,b)),X8))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_19, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38 # Returning from population with 2 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.38 # We now have 2 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.38 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.12/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------