TSTP Solution File: GRP353-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP353-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:37:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 81.45s 81.64s
% Output   : Refutation 81.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  21 unt;  20 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  106 ( 105 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X),X) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z) = multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(prove_this_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c6,sk_c7) = sk_c5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_1) ).

cnf(prove_this_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c1,sk_c7) = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_10) ).

cnf(prove_this_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c1,sk_c7) = sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_11) ).

cnf(prove_this_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c6) = sk_c7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_15) ).

cnf(prove_this_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_16) ).

cnf(prove_this_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_17) ).

cnf(prove_this_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c7,sk_c5) = sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_20) ).

cnf(prove_this_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c7,sk_c5) = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c6) = sk_c7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_21) ).

cnf(prove_this_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) != sk_c7
    | multiply(X,sk_c7) != sk_c6
    | inverse(X) != sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c7,sk_c5) != sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c6,sk_c7) != sk_c5
    | inverse(Y) != sk_c7
    | multiply(Y,sk_c6) != sk_c7
    | multiply(Z,U) != sk_c6
    | inverse(Z) != U
    | multiply(U,sk_c7) != sk_c6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_25) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    X = multiply(inverse(Y),multiply(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[associativity,left_inverse,theory(equality)]),left_identity,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),Y) = multiply(X,identity),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[associativity,left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(112,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) != sk_c7
    | multiply(X,sk_c7) != sk_c6
    | inverse(X) != sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c7,sk_c5) != sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c6,sk_c7) != sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c2) != sk_c7
    | multiply(Y,Z) != sk_c6
    | inverse(Y) != Z
    | multiply(Z,sk_c7) != sk_c6 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_25,prove_this_15,theory(equality)]),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(142,plain,
    X = multiply(inverse(inverse(X)),identity),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(143,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = multiply(inverse(inverse(X)),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    X = multiply(X,identity),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[142,143,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),Y) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33,144,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | sk_c4 = multiply(inverse(sk_c3),sk_c6) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,prove_this_16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(178,plain,
    X = inverse(inverse(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[146,left_inverse,theory(equality)]),left_identity,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(X)) = identity,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[left_inverse,178,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(190,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[146,178,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(209,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c6,inverse(sk_c5)) = sk_c7 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[190,prove_this_20,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(223,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c2,sk_c6) = sk_c7
    | multiply(sk_c6,inverse(sk_c5)) = sk_c7 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[190,prove_this_21,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(237,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | sk_c4 = multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[147,prove_this_17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(244,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c7
    | identity = sk_c6 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,237,theory(equality)]),left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(250,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c1,sk_c7) = identity ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[189,244,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(262,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_11,250,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(264,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c6 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_10,250,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(267,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = identity ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[189,262,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(663,plain,
    identity = sk_c6,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[264,267,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(664,plain,
    sk_c5 = sk_c7,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_1,left_identity,663,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(773,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c5,sk_c5) = identity
    | sk_c2 = sk_c5 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_21,144,664,663,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(777,plain,
    ( multiply(X,sk_c5) != identity
    | inverse(X) != sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c5,sk_c5) != identity
    | inverse(Y) != sk_c5
    | Y != sk_c5 ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_25,144,664,left_identity,663,theory(equality)])]) ).

cnf(810,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c5
    | multiply(X,sk_c5) != identity
    | inverse(X) != sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c5,sk_c5) != identity
    | inverse(sk_c2) != sk_c5 ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[112,left_identity,664,663,theory(equality)])]) ).

cnf(827,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c5) = sk_c5 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[209,left_identity,664,663,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(830,plain,
    ( sk_c2 = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c5) = sk_c5 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[223,left_identity,664,144,663,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(893,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c5,sk_c5) != identity
    | inverse(X) != sk_c5
    | X != sk_c5 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[777,left_inverse,theory(equality)]),178,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1440,plain,
    sk_c2 = sk_c5,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[893,773,830,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1529,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c2
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c2) != identity
    | sk_c2 != inverse(sk_c2) ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[810,1440,theory(equality)])]) ).

cnf(1536,plain,
    sk_c2 = inverse(sk_c2),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[827,1440,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1541,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c2
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c2) != identity ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1529,1536,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1567,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c2,sk_c2) != identity
    | inverse(X) != sk_c2
    | X != sk_c2 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[893,1440,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1734,plain,
    multiply(sk_c2,sk_c2) = identity,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[189,1536,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1736,plain,
    inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c2,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1541,1734,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1743,plain,
    ( inverse(X) != sk_c2
    | X != sk_c2 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1567,1734,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1755,plain,
    sk_c1 = sk_c2,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[178,1736,theory(equality)]),1536,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1777,plain,
    inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c1,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1536,1755,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1818,plain,
    ( inverse(X) != sk_c1
    | X != sk_c1 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1743,1755,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1824,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1818,1777,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : GRP353-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 18:01:20 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42  * 
% 0.16/0.42  * 
% 0.16/0.43  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.43   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.16/0.43   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.16/0.43   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.16/0.43   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.16/0.43   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  "."
% 0.16/0.43  * 
% 0.16/0.43  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T18:01:20
% 0.16/0.43  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T18:01:20
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiply| |identity| ?X) ?X).
% 0.16/0.44  ; Recognized possible left inverse assertion (= (|multiply| (|inverse| ?X) ?X) |identity|).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiply| (|multiply| ?X ?Y) ?Z) (|multiply| ?X (|multiply| ?Y ?Z))).
% 81.45/81.64  
% 81.45/81.64  #||
% 81.45/81.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 81.45/81.64  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 81.45/81.64  ||#
% 81.45/81.64  
% 81.45/81.64  ; Summary of computation:
% 81.45/81.64  ;    287203 formulas have been input or derived (from 249 formulas).
% 81.45/81.64  ;      1824 ( 1%) were retained.  Of these,
% 81.45/81.64  ;         1776 (97%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 81.45/81.64  ;           48 ( 3%) are still being kept.
% 81.45/81.64  ; 
% 81.45/81.64  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.003   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (28 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.769   1%   Process new row              (137,741 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;    32.376  40%   Resolution                   (496 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.079   0%   Paramodulation               (248 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (218 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.250   0%   Condensing                   (135,710 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;    37.439  46%   Forward subsumption          (135,710 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.050   0%   Backward subsumption         (1,757 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     3.191   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (583,087 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     6.476   8%   Forward simplification       (137,295 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.053   0%   Backward simplification      (1,824 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.044   0%   Ordering                     (21,795 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     0.474   1%   Other
% 81.45/81.64  ;    81.206        Total
% 81.45/81.64  ;    81.209        Real time
% 81.45/81.64  ; 
% 81.45/81.64  ; Term-hash-array has 1,207 terms in all.
% 81.45/81.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6 entries (699 at peak, 1,757 added, 1,751 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 47 nodes (4,270 at peak, 9,808 added, 9,761 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ;  Retrieved 4,563,256 possibly forward subsuming rows in 135,710 calls.
% 81.45/81.64  ;  Retrieved 1,455 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,757 calls.
% 81.45/81.64  ; Path-index has 137 entries (643 at peak, 1,518 added, 1,381 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Path-index has 218 nodes (372 at peak, 644 added, 426 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Trie-index has 137 entries (643 at peak, 1,518 added, 1,381 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Trie-index has 397 nodes (1,609 at peak, 3,355 added, 2,958 deleted).
% 81.45/81.64  ; Retrieved 6,986 generalization terms in 1,537,443 calls.
% 81.45/81.64  ; Retrieved 170 instance terms in 89 calls.
% 81.45/81.64  ; Retrieved 26,040,804 unifiable terms in 878,504 calls.
% 81.45/81.64  ; 
% 81.45/81.64  ; The agenda of rows to process has 17 entries:
% 81.45/81.64  ;     2 with value 8               3 with value 12               1 with value 16
% 81.45/81.64  ;     2 with value 9               4 with value 13               1 with value 17
% 81.45/81.64  ;     1 with value 10              1 with value 15               1 with value 18
% 81.45/81.64  ;     1 with value 11
% 81.45/81.64  ; The agenda of rows to give has 28 entries:
% 81.45/81.64  ;     1 with value (4 12)          6 with value (4 20)           4 with value (4 23)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     2 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 21)           4 with value (4 24)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     3 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 22)           1 with value (4 26)
% 81.45/81.64  ;     3 with value (4 19)
% 81.45/81.64  Evaluation took:
% 81.45/81.64    81.21 seconds of real time
% 81.45/81.64    79.450195 seconds of user run time
% 81.45/81.64    1.759526 seconds of system run time
% 81.45/81.64    [Run times include 2.963 seconds GC run time.]
% 81.45/81.64    0 calls to %EVAL
% 81.45/81.64    0 page faults and
% 81.45/81.64    8,672,478,240 bytes consed.
% 81.45/81.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 81.45/81.64  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T18:02:41
% 81.45/81.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 81.45/81.64  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------