TSTP Solution File: GRP300-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP300-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:37:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.45s 3.62s
% Output   : Refutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  24 unt;  18 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   80 (  79 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X),X) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z) = multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',associativity) ).

cnf(prove_this_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) = sk_c4
    | multiply(sk_c5,sk_c4) = sk_c6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_1) ).

cnf(prove_this_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c1,sk_c6) = sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_11) ).

cnf(prove_this_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c1,sk_c6) = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_12) ).

cnf(prove_this_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_17) ).

cnf(prove_this_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_18) ).

cnf(prove_this_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) = sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c6) = sk_c5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_20) ).

cnf(prove_this_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_21) ).

cnf(prove_this_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c6) = sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_22) ).

cnf(prove_this_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) != sk_c4
    | multiply(X,sk_c6) != sk_c5
    | inverse(X) != sk_c6
    | multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) != sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c5,sk_c4) != sk_c6
    | multiply(Y,sk_c6) != sk_c5
    | inverse(Y) != sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c6) != sk_c4
    | multiply(Z,sk_c4) != sk_c5
    | inverse(Z) != sk_c4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this_25) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c6,sk_c5) != sk_c4
    | multiply(sk_c4,sk_c6) != sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c5,sk_c4) != sk_c6
    | multiply(X,sk_c6) != sk_c5
    | inverse(X) != sk_c6
    | inverse(sk_c6) != sk_c4
    | multiply(Y,sk_c4) != sk_c5
    | inverse(Y) != sk_c4 ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_25]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    X = multiply(inverse(Y),multiply(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[associativity,left_inverse,theory(equality)]),left_identity,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),Y) = multiply(X,identity),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[associativity,left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(117,plain,
    X = multiply(inverse(inverse(X)),identity),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(118,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = multiply(inverse(inverse(X)),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(119,plain,
    X = multiply(X,identity),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[117,118,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(120,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),Y) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,119,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c6
    | sk_c4 = multiply(inverse(sk_c3),sk_c5) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,prove_this_17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(131,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c6) = sk_c4
    | sk_c6 = multiply(inverse(sk_c4),sk_c5) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,prove_this_22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[left_inverse,119,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(150,plain,
    X = inverse(inverse(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[120,left_inverse,theory(equality)]),left_identity,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(159,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(X)) = identity,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[left_inverse,150,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(160,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[120,150,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(172,plain,
    inverse(X) = multiply(inverse(multiply(Y,X)),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,160,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(247,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c6
    | sk_c4 = multiply(sk_c4,sk_c5) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[122,prove_this_18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(252,plain,
    ( inverse(sk_c1) = sk_c6
    | identity = sk_c5 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[34,247,theory(equality)]),left_inverse,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(256,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c1,sk_c6) = identity ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[159,252,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(267,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c5
    | inverse(sk_c3) = sk_c4 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_12,256,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(270,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = sk_c5 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_11,256,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(273,plain,
    ( identity = sk_c5
    | multiply(sk_c3,sk_c4) = identity ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[159,267,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(395,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X),Y) = inverse(multiply(inverse(Y),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[120,172,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(767,plain,
    identity = sk_c5,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[270,273,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(768,plain,
    sk_c4 = sk_c6,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_1,left_identity,119,767,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(852,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c4) = identity
    | multiply(sk_c2,sk_c4) = identity ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_20,768,767,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(853,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c4) = identity
    | inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c4 ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_this_21,768,767,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(857,plain,
    ( multiply(sk_c4,sk_c4) != identity
    | inverse(sk_c4) != sk_c4 ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[29,left_identity,119,768,767,theory(equality)])]) ).

cnf(884,plain,
    inverse(sk_c4) = sk_c4,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[131,left_identity,147,395,768,767,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(893,plain,
    multiply(sk_c4,sk_c4) != identity,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[857,884,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(895,plain,
    multiply(sk_c2,sk_c4) = identity,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[852,893]) ).

cnf(896,plain,
    inverse(sk_c2) = sk_c4,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[853,893]) ).

cnf(900,plain,
    sk_c2 = sk_c4,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[150,896,theory(equality)]),884,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(915,plain,
    multiply(sk_c2,sk_c2) != identity,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[893,900,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(917,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[895,915,900,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GRP300-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 17:59:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.49  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.50   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.50   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.50   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.50   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.50   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  "."
% 0.21/0.50  * 
% 0.21/0.50  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T17:59:18
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T17:59:18
% 0.35/0.52  
% 0.35/0.52  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiply| |identity| ?X) ?X).
% 0.35/0.52  ; Recognized possible left inverse assertion (= (|multiply| (|inverse| ?X) ?X) |identity|).
% 3.45/3.62  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiply| (|multiply| ?X ?Y) ?Z) (|multiply| ?X (|multiply| ?Y ?Z))).
% 3.45/3.62  
% 3.45/3.62  #||
% 3.45/3.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.45/3.63  ||#
% 3.45/3.63  
% 3.45/3.63  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     26292 formulas have been input or derived (from 122 formulas).
% 3.45/3.63  ;       917 ( 3%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.45/3.63  ;          870 (95%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.45/3.63  ;           47 ( 5%) are still being kept.
% 3.45/3.63  ; 
% 3.45/3.63  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.006   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (28 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.118   4%   Process new row              (8,383 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1.465  47%   Resolution                   (242 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.033   1%   Paramodulation               (121 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (103 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.026   1%   Condensing                   (7,175 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1.047  34%   Forward subsumption          (7,175 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.024   1%   Backward subsumption         (858 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.067   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (20,496 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.237   8%   Forward simplification       (8,129 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.025   1%   Backward simplification      (916 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.013   0%   Ordering                     (8,701 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     0.057   2%   Other
% 3.45/3.63  ;     3.120        Total
% 3.45/3.63  ;     3.124        Real time
% 3.45/3.63  ; 
% 3.45/3.63  ; Term-hash-array has 649 terms in all.
% 3.45/3.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 12 entries (642 at peak, 858 added, 846 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 51 nodes (4,391 at peak, 5,608 added, 5,557 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ;  Retrieved 88,314 possibly forward subsuming rows in 7,175 calls.
% 3.45/3.63  ;  Retrieved 432 possibly backward subsumed rows in 858 calls.
% 3.45/3.63  ; Path-index has 133 entries (520 at peak, 761 added, 628 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ; Path-index has 200 nodes (317 at peak, 415 added, 215 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ; Trie-index has 133 entries (520 at peak, 761 added, 628 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ; Trie-index has 386 nodes (1,213 at peak, 1,765 added, 1,379 deleted).
% 3.45/3.63  ; Retrieved 3,173 generalization terms in 59,597 calls.
% 3.45/3.63  ; Retrieved 134 instance terms in 76 calls.
% 3.45/3.63  ; Retrieved 1,232,268 unifiable terms in 48,114 calls.
% 3.45/3.63  ; 
% 3.45/3.63  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 4 entries:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     4 with value 0
% 3.45/3.63  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1 with value 11              2 with value 14               1 with value 17
% 3.45/3.63  ;     2 with value 12
% 3.45/3.63  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 2 entries:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1 with value 4               1 with value 7
% 3.45/3.63  ; The agenda of rows to give has 32 entries:
% 3.45/3.63  ;     2 with value (4 7)           3 with value (4 18)           1 with value (4 22)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1 with value (4 8)           7 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 23)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1 with value (4 12)          6 with value (4 20)           3 with value (4 24)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     1 with value (4 13)          2 with value (4 21)           1 with value (4 26)
% 3.45/3.63  ;     2 with value (4 16)
% 3.45/3.63  Evaluation took:
% 3.45/3.63    3.125 seconds of real time
% 3.45/3.63    3.013639 seconds of user run time
% 3.45/3.63    0.109722 seconds of system run time
% 3.45/3.63    [Run times include 0.089 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.45/3.63    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.45/3.63    0 page faults and
% 3.45/3.63    301,807,448 bytes consed.
% 3.45/3.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.45/3.63  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T17:59:21
% 3.45/3.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.45/3.63  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------