TSTP Solution File: GRP192-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP192-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:40:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.43s 2.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  30 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (;  32   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > least_upper_bound > greatest_lower_bound > #nlpp > inverse > identity > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(greatest_lower_bound,type,
    greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(least_upper_bound,type,
    least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(inverse(X),X) = identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(identity,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_101,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( least_upper_bound(X,greatest_lower_bound(X,Y)) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( least_upper_bound(identity,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [Y,Z,X] : ( multiply(greatest_lower_bound(Y,Z),X) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(Y,X),multiply(Z,X)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X,Y) = greatest_lower_bound(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_118,axiom,
    multiply(a,b) != multiply(b,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_2] : ( multiply(inverse(X_2),X_2) = identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( multiply(identity,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_121,plain,
    ! [X_42,Y_43] : ( least_upper_bound(X_42,greatest_lower_bound(X_42,Y_43)) = X_42 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [X_34] : ( least_upper_bound(identity,X_34) = X_34 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    ! [Y_43] : ( greatest_lower_bound(identity,Y_43) = identity ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_121,c_32]) ).

tff(c_883,plain,
    ! [Y_70,X_71,Z_72] : ( greatest_lower_bound(multiply(Y_70,X_71),multiply(Z_72,X_71)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(Y_70,Z_72),X_71) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_947,plain,
    ! [Z_72,X_1] : ( multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,Z_72),X_1) = greatest_lower_bound(X_1,multiply(Z_72,X_1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_883]) ).

tff(c_965,plain,
    ! [X_73,Z_74] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X_73,multiply(Z_74,X_73)) = X_73 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_128,c_947]) ).

tff(c_1022,plain,
    ! [X_75] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X_75,identity) = X_75 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_965]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [Y_7,X_6] : ( greatest_lower_bound(Y_7,X_6) = greatest_lower_bound(X_6,Y_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ! [Y_44] : ( greatest_lower_bound(identity,Y_44) = identity ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_121,c_32]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ! [X_6] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X_6,identity) = identity ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_148]) ).

tff(c_1200,plain,
    identity = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1022,c_173]) ).

tff(c_1091,plain,
    ! [X_76] : ( identity = X_76 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1022,c_173]) ).

tff(c_1201,plain,
    ! [X_76] : ( a = X_76 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1200,c_1091]) ).

tff(c_1184,plain,
    identity = a,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1022,c_173]) ).

tff(c_1185,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( multiply(a,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1184,c_2]) ).

tff(c_1187,plain,
    identity = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1022,c_173]) ).

tff(c_1188,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( multiply(b,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1187,c_2]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    multiply(b,a) != multiply(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_2285,plain,
    multiply(a,b) != a,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1188,c_34]) ).

tff(c_2405,plain,
    b != a,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1185,c_2285]) ).

tff(c_2410,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1201,c_2405]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14  % Problem  : GRP192-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:20:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.43/2.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.43/2.14  
% 4.43/2.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.66/2.17  
% 4.66/2.17  Inference rules
% 4.66/2.17  ----------------------
% 4.66/2.17  #Ref     : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #Sup     : 687
% 4.66/2.17  #Fact    : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #Define  : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #Split   : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #Chain   : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #Close   : 0
% 4.66/2.17  
% 4.66/2.17  Ordering : KBO
% 4.66/2.17  
% 4.66/2.17  Simplification rules
% 4.66/2.17  ----------------------
% 4.66/2.17  #Subsume      : 187
% 4.66/2.17  #Demod        : 251
% 4.66/2.17  #Tautology    : 264
% 4.66/2.17  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.66/2.17  #BackRed      : 3
% 4.66/2.17  
% 4.66/2.17  #Partial instantiations: 111
% 4.66/2.17  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.66/2.17  
% 4.66/2.17  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.66/2.17  ----------------------
% 4.66/2.17  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 4.66/2.17  Parsing              : 0.24
% 4.66/2.17  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 4.66/2.17  Main loop            : 0.62
% 4.66/2.17  Inferencing          : 0.24
% 4.66/2.17  Reduction            : 0.21
% 4.66/2.17  Demodulation         : 0.17
% 4.66/2.17  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.66/2.17  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.66/2.17  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.66/2.17  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.66/2.17  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.66/2.17  Total                : 1.13
% 4.66/2.17  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.66/2.17  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.66/2.17  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.66/2.17  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------