TSTP Solution File: GRP191-2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GRP191-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:46:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  50 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (  49 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',associativity) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',left_inverse) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',left_identity) ).

cnf(monotony_glb2,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',monotony_glb2) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',lub_absorbtion) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(monotony_glb1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',monotony_glb1) ).

cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',glb_absorbtion) ).

cnf(p39d_1,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',p39d_1) ).

cnf(prove_p39d,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),inverse(b)) != inverse(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p',prove_p39d) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    associativity ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),identity) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),X2) = multiply(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_glb2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    lub_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiply(X1,multiply(X2,inverse(multiply(X1,X2)))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X1,multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity),X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_glb1 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_24]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    glb_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity))) = inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_17]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity),inverse(X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X1,identity))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(multiply(X2,X1))) = multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1),inverse(X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1))) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),X1) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_28]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,multiply(inverse(X1),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_37]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,inverse(multiply(X2,X3))),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X2,inverse(X1)))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_14]),c_0_32]),c_0_41]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = b,
    p39d_1 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(X1),inverse(greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1))) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(b,a) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(a),inverse(b)) != inverse(b),
    prove_p39d ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(inverse(b),inverse(a)) = inverse(a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(inverse(b),inverse(a)) != inverse(b),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GRP191-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 02:59:14 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WMUzQUmaTd/E---3.1_22498.p
% 0.14/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # new_bool_1 with pid 22577 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.54  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 22582 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.54  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.54  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.54  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.54  
% 0.14/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.14/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.14/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 0.14/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 1119
% 0.14/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 378
% 0.14/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 454
% 0.14/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 287
% 0.14/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 0.14/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 15550
% 0.14/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10006
% 0.14/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 15550
% 0.14/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 18896
% 0.14/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 251
% 0.14/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 242
% 0.14/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 0.14/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8874
% 0.14/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8874
% 0.14/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 0.14/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.14/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 498
% 0.14/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 280
% 0.14/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 171166
% 0.14/0.54  
% 0.14/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.54  # User time                : 0.128 s
% 0.14/0.54  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.54  # Total time               : 0.137 s
% 0.14/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.14/0.54  
% 0.14/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.54  # User time                : 0.129 s
% 0.14/0.54  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.54  # Total time               : 0.139 s
% 0.14/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.14/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------