TSTP Solution File: GRP190-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP190-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JmM8fAvjQL true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 18.96s 3.36s
% Output : Refutation 18.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP190-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JmM8fAvjQL true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:18:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.57/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 18.96/3.36 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 18.96/3.36 % done 1577 iterations in 2.583s
% 18.96/3.36 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 18.96/3.36 % SZS output start Refutation
% 18.96/3.36 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(identity_type, type, identity: $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(p39a_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) = ( a ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (a))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p39a_1])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(left_inverse, axiom, (( multiply @ ( inverse @ X ) @ X ) = ( identity ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(associativity, axiom,
% 18.96/3.36 (( multiply @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 18.96/3.36 ( multiply @ X @ ( multiply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ X2)
% 18.96/3.36 = (multiply @ X0 @ (multiply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ identity @ X0)
% 18.96/3.36 = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(left_identity, axiom, (( multiply @ identity @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ identity @ X0) = (X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) @ identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ X1 @ X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X1)) @ X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl269, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) @ identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl294, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl269, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl303, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ (inverse @ X0)) = (identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl294, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 18.96/3.36 (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 18.96/3.36 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl311, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ (inverse @ X0))
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ X1 @ (inverse @ X0))))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl303, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16854, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (((multiply @ a @ (inverse @ a))
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ b @ (inverse @ a))))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl311])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl303, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ (inverse @ X0)) = (identity))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl294, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16908, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (((identity)
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ b @ (inverse @ a))))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.96/3.36 [zip_derived_cl16854, zip_derived_cl303])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(monotony_lub1, axiom,
% 18.96/3.36 (( multiply @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 18.96/3.36 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub1])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl86, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @
% 18.96/3.36 (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ X2) @ X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16969, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (((multiply @ (inverse @ b) @ identity)
% 18.96/3.36 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ (inverse @ b) @ identity) @
% 18.96/3.36 (inverse @ a)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16908, zip_derived_cl86])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl269, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl269, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 18.96/3.36 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 18.96/3.36 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16986, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (((inverse @ b) = (least_upper_bound @ (inverse @ a) @ (inverse @ b)))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 18.96/3.36 [zip_derived_cl16969, zip_derived_cl269, zip_derived_cl269,
% 18.96/3.36 zip_derived_cl4])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(prove_p39a, conjecture,
% 18.96/3.36 (( least_upper_bound @ ( inverse @ a ) @ ( inverse @ b ) ) =
% 18.96/3.36 ( inverse @ b ))).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 18.96/3.36 (( least_upper_bound @ ( inverse @ a ) @ ( inverse @ b ) ) !=
% 18.96/3.36 ( inverse @ b )),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p39a])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 18.96/3.36 (((least_upper_bound @ (inverse @ a) @ (inverse @ b)) != (inverse @ b))),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 18.96/3.36 thf(zip_derived_cl16987, plain, ($false),
% 18.96/3.36 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 18.96/3.36 [zip_derived_cl16986, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 18.96/3.36
% 18.96/3.36 % SZS output end Refutation
% 18.96/3.36
% 18.96/3.36
% 18.96/3.36 % Terminating...
% 19.94/3.45 % Runner terminated.
% 19.94/3.46 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------