TSTP Solution File: GRP188-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP188-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:39:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 13 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p',lub_absorbtion) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).
cnf(prove_p38a,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(a,b)) != least_upper_bound(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p',prove_p38a) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p',glb_absorbtion) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
lub_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(a,b)) != least_upper_bound(a,b),
prove_p38a ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
glb_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(b,least_upper_bound(b,a)) != least_upper_bound(b,a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GRP188-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:11:29 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WNmApbIVSF/E---3.1_11589.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 11668 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11672 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 37
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 38
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 38
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 27
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 43
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 35
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 414
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------