TSTP Solution File: GRP186-4 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:46:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    equal(inverse(inverse(u)),u),
    file('GRP186-4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ equal(multiply(a,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),b)),least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity)),
    file('GRP186-4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    equal(multiply(inverse(u),u),identity),
    file('GRP186-4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    equal(least_upper_bound(u,v),least_upper_bound(v,u)),
    file('GRP186-4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    equal(multiply(u,least_upper_bound(v,w)),least_upper_bound(multiply(u,v),multiply(u,w))),
    file('GRP186-4.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ~ equal(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),multiply(a,inverse(a))),least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,4,9]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:16.0,4.0,9.0,4.0,9.0,4.0')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    equal(multiply(u,inverse(u)),identity),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,6]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:2.0,6.0')] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ~ equal(least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[30,20]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:30.0,20.0')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ~ equal(least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b)),least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,31]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:9.0,31.0')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[32]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:32.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 11:07:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 11 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 21 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 63118 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 10 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : p23x_2 prove_p23x left_inverse symmetry_of_lub monotony_lub1
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------