TSTP Solution File: GRP186-4 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:17:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 14 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 4 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
b: $i ).
cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).
cnf(p23x_2,hypothesis,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23x_2) ).
cnf(prove_p23x,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity) != multiply(a,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),b)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p23x) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
left_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
p23x_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity) != multiply(a,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),b)),
prove_p23x ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
monotony_lub1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
multiply(a,least_upper_bound(b,inverse(a))) != least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,inverse(X1))) = least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:29:30 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.59 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.57/0.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.57/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.61 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.57/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.61 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------