TSTP Solution File: GRP182-1 by Toma---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Toma---0.4
% Problem : GRP182-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : toma --casc %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:14:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : GRP182-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : toma --casc %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:22:56 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.17/0.44 original problem:
% 0.17/0.44 axioms:
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(identity(), X) = X
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(inverse(X), X) = identity()
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(multiply(X, Y), Z) = multiply(X, multiply(Y, Z))
% 0.17/0.44 greatest_lower_bound(X, Y) = greatest_lower_bound(Y, X)
% 0.17/0.44 least_upper_bound(X, Y) = least_upper_bound(Y, X)
% 0.17/0.44 greatest_lower_bound(X, greatest_lower_bound(Y, Z)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X, Y), Z)
% 0.17/0.44 least_upper_bound(X, least_upper_bound(Y, Z)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X, Y), Z)
% 0.17/0.44 least_upper_bound(X, X) = X
% 0.17/0.44 greatest_lower_bound(X, X) = X
% 0.17/0.44 least_upper_bound(X, greatest_lower_bound(X, Y)) = X
% 0.17/0.44 greatest_lower_bound(X, least_upper_bound(X, Y)) = X
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(X, least_upper_bound(Y, Z)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(X, greatest_lower_bound(Y, Z)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z))
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(least_upper_bound(Y, Z), X) = least_upper_bound(multiply(Y, X), multiply(Z, X))
% 0.17/0.44 multiply(greatest_lower_bound(Y, Z), X) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(Y, X), multiply(Z, X))
% 0.17/0.44 goal:
% 0.17/0.44 least_upper_bound(identity(), greatest_lower_bound(a(), identity())) != identity()
% 0.17/0.44 To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.17/0.44 it suffices to show that least_upper_bound(identity(), greatest_lower_bound(a(), identity())) = identity() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.17/0.44 Here is an equational proof:
% 0.17/0.44 3: greatest_lower_bound(X0, X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1, X0).
% 0.17/0.44 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 9: least_upper_bound(X0, greatest_lower_bound(X0, X1)) = X0.
% 0.17/0.44 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 15: least_upper_bound(identity(), greatest_lower_bound(a(), identity())) = identity().
% 0.17/0.44 Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [3,9]
% 0.17/0.44 rhs with equations [].
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------