TSTP Solution File: GRP182-1 by Faust---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Faust---1.0
% Problem  : GRP182-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : faust %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed May  6 12:32:32 EDT 2009

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Refutation 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   1 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Faust---1.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
fof(prove_p17a,plain,
    ~ $equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),identity),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(159448808,plain,
    ~ $equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),identity),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_p17a]),
    [] ).

fof(symmetry_of_glb,plain,
    ! [B,A] : $equal(greatest_lower_bound(B,A),greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(159341576,plain,
    $equal(greatest_lower_bound(B,A),greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_glb]),
    [] ).

cnf(167317232,plain,
    ~ $equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(identity,a)),identity),
    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[159448808,159341576,theory(equality)]),
    [] ).

fof(lub_absorbtion,plain,
    ! [A,B] : $equal(least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),A),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(159373760,plain,
    $equal(least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),A),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[lub_absorbtion]),
    [] ).

cnf(contradiction,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[167317232,159373760]),
    [] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Proof found in: 0 seconds
% START OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% fof(prove_p17a,plain,(~$equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),identity)),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(159448808,plain,(~$equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(a,identity)),identity)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_p17a]),[]).
% 
% fof(symmetry_of_glb,plain,($equal(greatest_lower_bound(B,A),greatest_lower_bound(A,B))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(159341576,plain,($equal(greatest_lower_bound(B,A),greatest_lower_bound(A,B))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_glb]),[]).
% 
% cnf(167317232,plain,(~$equal(least_upper_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(identity,a)),identity)),inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[159448808,159341576,theory(equality)]),[]).
% 
% fof(lub_absorbtion,plain,($equal(least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),A)),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/GRP/GRP182-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(159373760,plain,($equal(least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B)),A)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[lub_absorbtion]),[]).
% 
% cnf(contradiction,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[167317232,159373760]),[]).
% 
% END OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------