TSTP Solution File: GRP175-4 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GRP175-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:17:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  24 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   3 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    a: $i ).

cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(p06d_1,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,b) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p06d_1) ).

cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(monotony_lub2,axiom,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(prove_p06d,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p06d) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    lub_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,b) = identity,
    p06d_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_lub1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_lub ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_lub2 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    prove_p06d ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(inverse(X1),least_upper_bound(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X2,identity),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_15]),c_0_21]),c_0_15]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11  % Problem    : GRP175-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 19:59:17 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.58  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.97  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.48/0.97  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.97  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.97  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.97  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.97  % Total time : 0.357000 s
% 0.48/0.97  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.48/0.97  % Total time : 0.359000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------