TSTP Solution File: GRP175-3 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:17:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:54:37 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.40  Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.40  
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 1 (left_identity): multiply(identity, X) = X.
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 2 (symmetry_of_glb): greatest_lower_bound(X, Y) = greatest_lower_bound(Y, X).
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 3 (p06c_1): least_upper_bound(identity, b) = b.
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 4 (left_inverse): multiply(inverse(X), X) = identity.
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 5 (glb_absorbtion): greatest_lower_bound(X, least_upper_bound(X, Y)) = X.
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 6 (monotony_glb1): multiply(X, greatest_lower_bound(Y, Z)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X, Y), multiply(X, Z)).
% 0.19/0.41  Axiom 7 (monotony_glb2): multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X, Y), Z) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X, Z), multiply(Y, Z)).
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Goal 1 (prove_p06c): greatest_lower_bound(identity, multiply(inverse(a), multiply(b, a))) = identity.
% 0.19/0.41  Proof:
% 0.19/0.41    greatest_lower_bound(identity, multiply(inverse(a), multiply(b, a)))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 2 (symmetry_of_glb) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    greatest_lower_bound(multiply(inverse(a), multiply(b, a)), identity)
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 4 (left_inverse) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    greatest_lower_bound(multiply(inverse(a), multiply(b, a)), multiply(inverse(a), a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 6 (monotony_glb1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), greatest_lower_bound(multiply(b, a), a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 1 (left_identity) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), greatest_lower_bound(multiply(b, a), multiply(identity, a)))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 7 (monotony_glb2) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), multiply(greatest_lower_bound(b, identity), a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 2 (symmetry_of_glb) }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity, b), a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 3 (p06c_1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), multiply(greatest_lower_bound(identity, least_upper_bound(identity, b)), a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 5 (glb_absorbtion) }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), multiply(identity, a))
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 1 (left_identity) }
% 0.19/0.41    multiply(inverse(a), a)
% 0.19/0.41  = { by axiom 4 (left_inverse) }
% 0.19/0.41    identity
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------