TSTP Solution File: GRP175-3 by Matita---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Matita---1.0
% Problem  : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:29:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 73.70s 18.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 73.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 05:52:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  13247: Facts:
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   2, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   3, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   4, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8)
% 0.12/0.34            [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   5, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10
% 0.12/0.34            [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   6, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13
% 0.12/0.34            [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   7, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18)
% 0.12/0.34            =?=
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18
% 0.12/0.34            [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   8, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22)
% 0.12/0.34            =?=
% 0.12/0.34            least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22
% 0.12/0.34            [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :   9, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :  10, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26
% 0.12/0.34            [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :  11, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28
% 0.12/0.34            [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :  12, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31
% 0.12/0.34            [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :  13, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36)
% 0.12/0.34            =<=
% 0.12/0.34            least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36)
% 0.12/0.34            [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36
% 0.12/0.34  13247:  Id :  14, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34            multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40)
% 0.12/0.34            =<=
% 0.12/0.34            greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40)
% 0.12/0.34            [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40
% 0.12/0.35  13247:  Id :  15, {_}:
% 0.12/0.35            multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44
% 0.12/0.35            =<=
% 0.12/0.35            least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44)
% 0.12/0.35            [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44
% 0.12/0.35  13247:  Id :  16, {_}:
% 0.12/0.35            multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48
% 0.12/0.35            =<=
% 0.12/0.35            greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48)
% 0.12/0.35            [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48
% 0.12/0.35  13247:  Id :  17, {_}: least_upper_bound identity b =>= b [] by p06c_1
% 0.12/0.35  13247: Goal:
% 0.12/0.35  13247:  Id :   1, {_}:
% 0.12/0.35            greatest_lower_bound identity (multiply (inverse a) (multiply b a))
% 0.12/0.35            =>=
% 0.12/0.35            identity
% 0.12/0.35            [] by prove_p06c
% 73.70/18.75  Statistics :
% 73.70/18.75  Max weight : 20
% 73.70/18.75  Found proof, 18.402267s
% 73.70/18.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 73.70/18.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 73.70/18.75  Id :   5, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11
% 73.70/18.75  Id :   2, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2
% 73.70/18.75  Id :  17, {_}: least_upper_bound identity b =>= b [] by p06c_1
% 73.70/18.75  Id :  12, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32
% 73.70/18.75  Id :  16, {_}: multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48 =>= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48) [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48
% 73.70/18.75  Id :  14, {_}: multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40) =>= greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40) [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40
% 73.70/18.75  Id :   3, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 45941, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound ?40260 ?40261)) ?40260) (multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound ?40260 ?40261)) ?40261) =>= identity [40261, 40260] by Super 3 with 14 at 2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 270, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity b =>= identity [] by Super 12 with 17 at 2,2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 276, {_}: multiply identity ?501 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply identity ?501) (multiply b ?501) [501] by Super 16 with 270 at 1,2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 286, {_}: ?501 =<= greatest_lower_bound (multiply identity ?501) (multiply b ?501) [501] by Demod 276 with 2 at 2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 287, {_}: ?501 =<= greatest_lower_bound ?501 (multiply b ?501) [501] by Demod 286 with 2 at 1,3
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 46032, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound ?40477 (multiply b ?40477))) ?40477) (multiply (inverse ?40477) (multiply b ?40477)) =>= identity [40477] by Super 45941 with 287 at 1,1,2,2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 46700, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (multiply (inverse ?40477) (multiply b ?40477)) (multiply (inverse (greatest_lower_bound ?40477 (multiply b ?40477))) ?40477) =>= identity [40477] by Demod 46032 with 5 at 2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 46701, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (multiply (inverse ?40477) (multiply b ?40477)) (multiply (inverse ?40477) ?40477) =>= identity [40477] by Demod 46700 with 287 at 1,1,2,2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 46702, {_}: greatest_lower_bound (multiply (inverse ?40477) ?40477) (multiply (inverse ?40477) (multiply b ?40477)) =>= identity [40477] by Demod 46701 with 5 at 2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 46703, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity (multiply (inverse ?40477) (multiply b ?40477)) =>= identity [40477] by Demod 46702 with 3 at 1,2
% 73.70/18.75  Id : 104896, {_}: identity === identity [] by Demod 1 with 46703 at 2
% 73.70/18.75  Id :   1, {_}: greatest_lower_bound identity (multiply (inverse a) (multiply b a)) =>= identity [] by prove_p06c
% 73.70/18.75  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 73.70/18.75  13249: solved /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 18.403783 using lpo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------