TSTP Solution File: GRP171-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP171-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:39:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 46 ( 46 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 45 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',associativity) ).
cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',left_inverse) ).
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',left_identity) ).
cnf(monotony_lub1,axiom,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',monotony_lub1) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',glb_absorbtion) ).
cnf(p04a_2,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',p04a_2) ).
cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',lub_absorbtion) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).
cnf(associativity_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',associativity_of_glb) ).
cnf(p04a_1,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(identity,a) = a,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',p04a_1) ).
cnf(prove_p04a,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b)) != multiply(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p',prove_p04a) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
associativity ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
left_inverse ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
left_identity ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),identity) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
multiply(inverse(inverse(X1)),X2) = multiply(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X3)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
monotony_lub1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
multiply(X1,identity) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
glb_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
p04a_2 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,multiply(X1,X2)) = multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,identity)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
lub_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
associativity_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(identity,b) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,identity))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(b,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(identity,X2))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(identity,a) = a,
p04a_1 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,greatest_lower_bound(X3,X1))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(identity,greatest_lower_bound(X1,b)) = greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X1,a)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
multiply(X1,inverse(X1)) = identity,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,greatest_lower_bound(identity,X1)) = b,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(identity,inverse(a)) = inverse(a),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_13]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
multiply(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,inverse(X1))) = least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_39]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,inverse(a)) = b,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b)) != multiply(a,b),
prove_p04a ).
cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : GRP171-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:37:39 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n1aXFRlogC/E---3.1_25205.p
% 0.21/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # sh5l with pid 25315 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25322 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.21/0.53 # Processed clauses : 215
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 58
% 0.21/0.53 # ...subsumed : 38
% 0.21/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 119
% 0.21/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.21/0.53 # Generated clauses : 1837
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 795
% 0.21/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Paramodulations : 1837
% 0.21/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 2111
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 95
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 92
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.21/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 605
% 0.21/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 605
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.21/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 82
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 50
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13744
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------