TSTP Solution File: GRP170-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP170-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Mr9v8iwb19 true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 210.79s 30.72s
% Output : Refutation 210.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GRP170-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Mr9v8iwb19 true
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:07:50 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.33 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.17/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.17/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.17/0.61 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.17/0.61 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.17/0.61 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.17/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.17/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.17/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 210.79/30.72 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 210.79/30.72 % BCE start: 18
% 210.79/30.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 210.79/30.72 % PE start: 18
% 210.79/30.72 logic: eq
% 210.79/30.72 % PE eliminated: 0
% 210.79/30.72 % done 1053 iterations in 29.980s
% 210.79/30.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 210.79/30.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 210.79/30.72 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(p03c_2, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ c @ d ) = ( d ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ c @ d) = (d))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03c_2])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(p03c_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) = ( b ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (b))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03c_1])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 210.79/30.72 (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 210.79/30.72 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 210.79/30.72 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(glb_absorbtion, axiom,
% 210.79/30.72 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl169, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))
% 210.79/30.72 = (multiply @ X2 @ X0))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl2649, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ X0) @ (multiply @ b @ X0))
% 210.79/30.72 = (multiply @ a @ X0))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl169])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(monotony_lub1, axiom,
% 210.79/30.72 (( multiply @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 210.79/30.72 ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((multiply @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 210.79/30.72 = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub1])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl115, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ X2 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0)))
% 210.79/30.72 = (multiply @ X2 @ X1))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(associativity_of_glb, axiom,
% 210.79/30.72 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 210.79/30.72 ( greatest_lower_bound @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_glb])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl521, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0) @
% 210.79/30.72 (greatest_lower_bound @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ X1 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X3)) @ X2))
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl115, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl46200, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ X1) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ a @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0)))
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ X1) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 210.79/30.72 [zip_derived_cl2649, zip_derived_cl521])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(monotony_glb1, axiom,
% 210.79/30.72 (( multiply @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 210.79/30.72 ( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((multiply @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_glb1])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl46361, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 210.79/30.72 ((multiply @ a @ X1)
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ X1) @
% 210.79/30.72 (multiply @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 210.79/30.72 [zip_derived_cl46200, zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl46692, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (((multiply @ a @ c)
% 210.79/30.72 = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d)))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 210.79/30.72 [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl46361])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(prove_p03c, conjecture,
% 210.79/30.72 (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) =
% 210.79/30.72 ( multiply @ a @ c ))).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 210.79/30.72 (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) !=
% 210.79/30.72 ( multiply @ a @ c )),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p03c])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 210.79/30.72 (((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 210.79/30.72 != (multiply @ a @ c))),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 210.79/30.72 thf(zip_derived_cl46705, plain, ($false),
% 210.79/30.72 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 210.79/30.72 [zip_derived_cl46692, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 210.79/30.72
% 210.79/30.72 % SZS output end Refutation
% 210.79/30.72
% 210.79/30.72
% 210.79/30.72 % Terminating...
% 211.38/30.80 % Runner terminated.
% 211.38/30.80 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------