TSTP Solution File: GRP170-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CcChR2AazL true

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.38s 1.34s
% Output   : Refutation 1.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.CcChR2AazL true
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 00:47:50 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.68  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.68  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.68  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.11/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.38/1.34  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.38/1.34  % BCE start: 18
% 1.38/1.34  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.38/1.34  % PE start: 18
% 1.38/1.34  logic: eq
% 1.38/1.34  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.38/1.34  % done 217 iterations in 0.604s
% 1.38/1.34  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.38/1.34  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.38/1.34  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(p03a_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) = ( b ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (b))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03a_1])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(p03a_2, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ c @ d ) = ( d ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ c @ d) = (d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p03a_2])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(glb_absorbtion, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain, (((greatest_lower_bound @ c @ d) = (c))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(monotony_glb1, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( multiply @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 1.38/1.34     ( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((multiply @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.38/1.34           = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 1.38/1.34              (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_glb1])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(symmetry_of_glb, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_glb])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(lub_absorbtion, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lub_absorbtion])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl178, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @ 
% 1.38/1.34           (multiply @ X2 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0)))
% 1.38/1.34           = (multiply @ X2 @ X0))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl2602, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ d) @ (multiply @ X0 @ c))
% 1.38/1.34           = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl51, zip_derived_cl178])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3109, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 1.38/1.34           = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2602, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 1.38/1.34     ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 1.38/1.34           = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 1.38/1.34    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 1.38/1.34     ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.38/1.34           = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl111, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X2 @ X0) @ 
% 1.38/1.34           (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 1.38/1.34           = (least_upper_bound @ 
% 1.38/1.34              (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ X1) @ X0) @ X3))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3174, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X1 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 1.38/1.34           = (least_upper_bound @ 
% 1.38/1.34              (multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) @ c) @ 
% 1.38/1.34              (multiply @ X0 @ d)))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)],
% 1.38/1.34                [zip_derived_cl3109, zip_derived_cl111])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3615, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 1.38/1.34         = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ b @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d)))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl3174])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3109, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.38/1.34         ((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ c) @ (multiply @ X0 @ d))
% 1.38/1.34           = (multiply @ X0 @ d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2602, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3660, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 1.38/1.34         = (multiply @ b @ d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.38/1.34                [zip_derived_cl3615, zip_derived_cl3109])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(prove_p03a, conjecture,
% 1.38/1.34    (( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) =
% 1.38/1.34     ( multiply @ b @ d ))).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.38/1.34    (( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ d ) ) !=
% 1.38/1.34     ( multiply @ b @ d )),
% 1.38/1.34    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p03a])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 1.38/1.34      (((least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ d))
% 1.38/1.34         != (multiply @ b @ d))),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.38/1.34  thf(zip_derived_cl3661, plain, ($false),
% 1.38/1.34      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 1.38/1.34                [zip_derived_cl3660, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 1.38/1.34  
% 1.38/1.34  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.38/1.34  
% 1.38/1.34  
% 1.38/1.34  % Terminating...
% 2.11/1.42  % Runner terminated.
% 2.11/1.43  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------