TSTP Solution File: GRP166-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GRP166-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:39:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 12 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(monotony_lub2,axiom,
multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p',monotony_lub2) ).
cnf(left_identity,axiom,
multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p',left_identity) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(lat3a_2,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p',lat3a_2) ).
cnf(prove_lat3a,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(a,multiply(b,a)) != multiply(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p',prove_lat3a) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
multiply(least_upper_bound(X1,X2),X3) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
monotony_lub2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
left_identity ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
lat3a_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(a,multiply(b,a)) != multiply(b,a),
prove_lat3a ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
least_upper_bound(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X2,identity),X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_7]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GRP166-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:44:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.larwSOlSAw/E---3.1_30574.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 30654 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 30659 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 196
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 70
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 31
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 95
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 1607
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 761
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 1607
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1671
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 69
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 64
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 594
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 594
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 154
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 107
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12352
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1524 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.084 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.094 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------