TSTP Solution File: GRP166-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP166-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:40:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 16.09s 7.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  14 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  16   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > least_upper_bound > greatest_lower_bound > #nlpp > inverse > identity > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(greatest_lower_bound,type,
    greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(least_upper_bound,type,
    least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(identity,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_110,axiom,
    ! [Y,Z,X] : ( multiply(least_upper_bound(Y,Z),X) = least_upper_bound(multiply(Y,X),multiply(Z,X)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_91,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( least_upper_bound(X,Y) = least_upper_bound(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_118,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(a,multiply(b,a)) != multiply(b,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ( multiply(identity,X_1) = X_1 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_787,plain,
    ! [Y_65,X_66,Z_67] : ( least_upper_bound(multiply(Y_65,X_66),multiply(Z_67,X_66)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(Y_65,Z_67),X_66) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_110]) ).

tff(c_5818,plain,
    ! [Y_126,X_127] : ( multiply(least_upper_bound(Y_126,identity),X_127) = least_upper_bound(multiply(Y_126,X_127),X_127) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_787]) ).

tff(c_8383,plain,
    ! [X_147] : ( least_upper_bound(multiply(b,X_147),X_147) = multiply(b,X_147) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_5818]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [Y_9,X_8] : ( least_upper_bound(Y_9,X_8) = least_upper_bound(X_8,Y_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_91]) ).

tff(c_8454,plain,
    ! [X_147] : ( least_upper_bound(X_147,multiply(b,X_147)) = multiply(b,X_147) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8383,c_10]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    least_upper_bound(a,multiply(b,a)) != multiply(b,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_51238,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8454,c_36]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GRP166-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:16:33 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 16.09/7.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.09/7.43  
% 16.09/7.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 16.09/7.45  
% 16.09/7.45  Inference rules
% 16.09/7.45  ----------------------
% 16.09/7.45  #Ref     : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Sup     : 13006
% 16.09/7.45  #Fact    : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Define  : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Split   : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Chain   : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Close   : 0
% 16.09/7.45  
% 16.09/7.45  Ordering : KBO
% 16.09/7.45  
% 16.09/7.45  Simplification rules
% 16.09/7.45  ----------------------
% 16.09/7.45  #Subsume      : 158
% 16.09/7.45  #Demod        : 13650
% 16.09/7.45  #Tautology    : 8236
% 16.09/7.45  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 16.09/7.45  #BackRed      : 5
% 16.09/7.45  
% 16.09/7.45  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 16.09/7.45  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 16.09/7.45  
% 16.09/7.45  Timing (in seconds)
% 16.09/7.45  ----------------------
% 16.09/7.45  Preprocessing        : 0.54
% 16.09/7.45  Parsing              : 0.31
% 16.09/7.45  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 16.09/7.45  Main loop            : 5.84
% 16.09/7.45  Inferencing          : 1.00
% 16.09/7.45  Reduction            : 3.49
% 16.09/7.45  Demodulation         : 3.18
% 16.09/7.45  BG Simplification    : 0.10
% 16.09/7.45  Subsumption          : 0.96
% 16.09/7.45  Abstraction          : 0.15
% 16.09/7.45  MUC search           : 0.00
% 16.09/7.45  Cooper               : 0.00
% 16.09/7.45  Total                : 6.42
% 16.09/7.45  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 16.09/7.45  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 16.09/7.45  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 16.09/7.45  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------