TSTP Solution File: GRP162-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GRP162-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:17:21 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 27 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 4 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 5 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
b: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
c: $i ).
cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',glb_absorbtion) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_lub,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).
cnf(ax_transa_1,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_transa_1) ).
cnf(ax_transa_2,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,c) = c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_transa_2) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).
cnf(associativity_of_glb,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).
cnf(lub_absorbtion,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).
cnf(prove_ax_transa,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(a,c) != c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_transa) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
glb_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_lub ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
ax_transa_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,c) = c,
ax_transa_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X2,X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
least_upper_bound(b,a) = b,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
symmetry_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3),
associativity_of_glb ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(b,c) = b,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
least_upper_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
lub_absorbtion ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(b,a) = a,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(b,greatest_lower_bound(c,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(b,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(b,greatest_lower_bound(a,X1)) = greatest_lower_bound(a,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(b,greatest_lower_bound(X1,c)) = greatest_lower_bound(b,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(a,c) != c,
prove_ax_transa ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
greatest_lower_bound(c,a) = a,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
least_upper_bound(c,a) != c,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP162-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 19:52:58 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.58 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.44/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.44/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.59 % Total time : 0.007000 s
% 0.44/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.44/0.59 % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------