TSTP Solution File: GRP159-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GRP159-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:40:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.17s 1.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 17 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 4 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 (; 20 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > least_upper_bound > greatest_lower_bound > #nlpp > inverse > identity > c > b > a
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
a: $i ).
tff(inverse,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(greatest_lower_bound,type,
greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(least_upper_bound,type,
least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(multiply,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(b,type,
b: $i ).
tff(identity,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(c,type,
c: $i ).
tff(f_115,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = a,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_89,axiom,
! [X,Y] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X,Y) = greatest_lower_bound(Y,X) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_101,axiom,
! [X,Y] : ( least_upper_bound(X,greatest_lower_bound(X,Y)) = X ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_91,axiom,
! [X,Y] : ( least_upper_bound(X,Y) = least_upper_bound(Y,X) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_106,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z] : ( multiply(X,least_upper_bound(Y,Z)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_117,axiom,
least_upper_bound(multiply(c,a),multiply(c,b)) != multiply(c,b),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_32,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = a,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_115]) ).
tff(c_91,plain,
! [Y_40,X_41] : ( greatest_lower_bound(Y_40,X_41) = greatest_lower_bound(X_41,Y_40) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
! [X_18,Y_19] : ( least_upper_bound(X_18,greatest_lower_bound(X_18,Y_19)) = X_18 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).
tff(c_253,plain,
! [Y_51,X_52] : ( least_upper_bound(Y_51,greatest_lower_bound(X_52,Y_51)) = Y_51 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_91,c_20]) ).
tff(c_291,plain,
least_upper_bound(b,a) = b,
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_32,c_253]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [Y_9,X_8] : ( least_upper_bound(Y_9,X_8) = least_upper_bound(X_8,Y_9) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_91]) ).
tff(c_309,plain,
least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_291,c_10]) ).
tff(c_24,plain,
! [X_22,Y_23,Z_24] : ( least_upper_bound(multiply(X_22,Y_23),multiply(X_22,Z_24)) = multiply(X_22,least_upper_bound(Y_23,Z_24)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_106]) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
least_upper_bound(multiply(c,a),multiply(c,b)) != multiply(c,b),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_117]) ).
tff(c_35,plain,
multiply(c,least_upper_bound(a,b)) != multiply(c,b),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_24,c_34]) ).
tff(c_338,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_309,c_35]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : GRP159-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:09:12 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 3.17/1.82 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.17/1.82
% 3.17/1.82 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.17/1.84
% 3.17/1.84 Inference rules
% 3.17/1.84 ----------------------
% 3.17/1.84 #Ref : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Sup : 78
% 3.17/1.84 #Fact : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Define : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Split : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Chain : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Close : 0
% 3.17/1.84
% 3.17/1.84 Ordering : KBO
% 3.17/1.84
% 3.17/1.84 Simplification rules
% 3.17/1.84 ----------------------
% 3.17/1.84 #Subsume : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Demod : 28
% 3.17/1.84 #Tautology : 65
% 3.17/1.84 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 3.17/1.84 #BackRed : 0
% 3.17/1.84
% 3.17/1.84 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.17/1.84 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.17/1.84
% 3.17/1.84 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.17/1.84 ----------------------
% 3.17/1.85 Preprocessing : 0.47
% 3.17/1.85 Parsing : 0.24
% 3.17/1.85 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 3.17/1.85 Main loop : 0.28
% 3.17/1.85 Inferencing : 0.10
% 3.17/1.85 Reduction : 0.10
% 3.17/1.85 Demodulation : 0.08
% 3.17/1.85 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.17/1.85 Subsumption : 0.05
% 3.17/1.85 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.17/1.85 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.17/1.85 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.17/1.85 Total : 0.80
% 3.17/1.85 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.17/1.85 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.17/1.85 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.17/1.85 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------