TSTP Solution File: GRP156-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP156-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wBOAWqfDj4 true

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.09s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 1.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP156-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wBOAWqfDj4 true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 02:52:40 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.09/0.77  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.09/0.77  % BCE start: 17
% 1.09/0.77  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.09/0.77  % PE start: 17
% 1.09/0.77  logic: eq
% 1.09/0.77  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.09/0.77  % done 22 iterations in 0.022s
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(prove_ax_mono1c, conjecture,
% 1.09/0.77    (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ c ) ) =
% 1.09/0.77     ( multiply @ a @ c ))).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.09/0.77    (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ a @ c ) @ ( multiply @ b @ c ) ) !=
% 1.09/0.77     ( multiply @ a @ c )),
% 1.09/0.77    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ax_mono1c])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 1.09/0.77      (((greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ a @ c) @ (multiply @ b @ c))
% 1.09/0.77         != (multiply @ a @ c))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(monotony_glb2, axiom,
% 1.09/0.77    (( multiply @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 1.09/0.77     ( greatest_lower_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 1.09/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.09/0.77         ((multiply @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 1.09/0.77           = (greatest_lower_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 1.09/0.77              (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_glb2])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(ax_mono1c_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) = ( b ))).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (b))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_mono1c_1])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(glb_absorbtion, axiom,
% 1.09/0.77    (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 1.09/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.09/0.77         ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, (((greatest_lower_bound @ a @ b) = (a))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl112, plain, (((multiply @ a @ c) != (multiply @ a @ c))),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.09/0.77                [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain, ($false),
% 1.09/0.77      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl112])).
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  % Terminating...
% 1.49/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.49/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------