TSTP Solution File: GRP152-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP152-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6JgL3j5Cvl true
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:23 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP152-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.6JgL3j5Cvl true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 20:50:43 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.36/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.36/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.36/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.78 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.78 % BCE start: 16
% 0.56/0.78 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.78 % PE start: 16
% 0.56/0.78 logic: eq
% 0.56/0.78 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.78 % done 18 iterations in 0.027s
% 0.56/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.78 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(prove_ax_lub3a, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.78 (( least_upper_bound @ b @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) =
% 0.56/0.78 ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ))).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.78 (( least_upper_bound @ b @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) ) !=
% 0.56/0.78 ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b )),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ax_lub3a])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (((least_upper_bound @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))
% 0.56/0.78 != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 0.56/0.78 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (((least_upper_bound @ b @ (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))
% 0.56/0.78 != (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.78 [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(idempotence_of_lub, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ X @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (![X0 : $i]: ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [idempotence_of_lub])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 0.56/0.78 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.56/0.78 ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.56/0.78 = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.78 = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain,
% 0.56/0.78 (((least_upper_bound @ b @ a) != (least_upper_bound @ b @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 0.56/0.78 thf(zip_derived_cl63, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.78 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl62])).
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78
% 0.56/0.78 % Terminating...
% 0.62/0.86 % Runner terminated.
% 0.62/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------