TSTP Solution File: GRP150-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GRP150-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:11:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GRP150-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 00:55:20 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.46/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.46/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.46/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.46/0.62  
% 0.46/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.46/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.62  % File     : GRP150-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.46/0.62  % Domain   : Group Theory (Lattice Ordered)
% 0.46/0.62  % Problem  : Prove least upper-bound axiom using the LUB transformation
% 0.46/0.62  % Version  : [Fuc94] (equality) axioms.
% 0.46/0.62  % English  : This problem proves the original least upper-bound axiom from
% 0.46/0.62  %            the equational axiomatization.
% 0.46/0.62  
% 0.46/0.62  % Refs     : [Fuc94] Fuchs (1994), The Application of Goal-Orientated Heuri
% 0.46/0.62  %          : [Sch95] Schulz (1995), Explanation Based Learning for Distribu
% 0.46/0.62  % Source   : [Sch95]
% 0.46/0.62  % Names    : ax_lub2a [Sch95]
% 0.46/0.62  
% 0.46/0.62  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.62  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.05 v6.4.0, 0.11 v6.3.0, 0.12 v6.2.0, 0.14 v6.1.0, 0.06 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.09 v4.0.1, 0.07 v4.0.0, 0.08 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.46/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;   1 RR)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Number of literals    :   16 (  16 equ;   1 neg)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   0 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.46/0.62  %            Number of variables   :   33 (   2 sgn)
% 0.46/0.62  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ
% 0.46/0.62  
% 0.46/0.62  % Comments : ORDERING LPO inverse > product > greatest_lower_bound >
% 0.46/0.62  %            least_upper_bound > identity > a > b
% 0.46/0.62  % Bugfixes : v1.2.1 - Duplicate axioms in GRP004-2.ax removed.
% 0.46/0.62  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.62  %----Include equality group theory axioms
% 0.46/0.62  include('Axioms/GRP004-0.ax').
% 0.46/0.62  %----Include Lattice ordered group (equality) axioms
% 0.46/0.63  include('Axioms/GRP004-2.ax').
% 0.46/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(prove_ax_lub2a,negated_conjecture,
% 0.46/0.63      least_upper_bound(a,least_upper_bound(a,b)) != least_upper_bound(a,b) ).
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.63  %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.46/0.63  %VarNum:72(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.46/0.63  %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.46/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.46/0.63  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.46/0.63  %goalClause: 26
% 0.46/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.46/0.63  [26]~E(f6(a3,f6(a3,a4)),f6(a3,a4))
% 0.46/0.63  [11]E(f5(a1,x111),x111)
% 0.46/0.63  [12]E(f2(x121,x121),x121)
% 0.46/0.63  [13]E(f6(x131,x131),x131)
% 0.46/0.63  [14]E(f5(f7(x141),x141),a1)
% 0.46/0.63  [15]E(f2(x151,x152),f2(x152,x151))
% 0.46/0.63  [16]E(f6(x161,x162),f6(x162,x161))
% 0.46/0.63  [17]E(f2(x171,f6(x171,x172)),x171)
% 0.46/0.63  [18]E(f6(x181,f2(x181,x182)),x181)
% 0.46/0.63  [19]E(f2(f2(x191,x192),x193),f2(x191,f2(x192,x193)))
% 0.46/0.63  [20]E(f6(f6(x201,x202),x203),f6(x201,f6(x202,x203)))
% 0.46/0.63  [21]E(f5(f5(x211,x212),x213),f5(x211,f5(x212,x213)))
% 0.46/0.63  [22]E(f2(f5(x221,x222),f5(x221,x223)),f5(x221,f2(x222,x223)))
% 0.46/0.63  [23]E(f6(f5(x231,x232),f5(x231,x233)),f5(x231,f6(x232,x233)))
% 0.46/0.63  [24]E(f2(f5(x241,x242),f5(x243,x242)),f5(f2(x241,x243),x242))
% 0.46/0.63  [25]E(f6(f5(x251,x252),f5(x253,x252)),f5(f6(x251,x253),x252))
% 0.46/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.46/0.63  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.46/0.63  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.46/0.63  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.46/0.63  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41,x43),f5(x42,x43))
% 0.46/0.63  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f5(x53,x51),f5(x53,x52))
% 0.46/0.63  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x61,x63),f2(x62,x63))
% 0.46/0.63  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x71),f2(x73,x72))
% 0.46/0.63  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f6(x81,x83),f6(x82,x83))
% 0.46/0.63  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f6(x93,x91),f6(x93,x92))
% 0.46/0.63  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f7(x101),f7(x102))
% 0.46/0.63  
% 0.46/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.46/0.63     (~E(f6(a3,a4),f6(a3,f6(a3,a4)))),
% 0.46/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,2])).
% 0.46/0.63  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.46/0.63     ($false),
% 0.46/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,20,37,3,2,8]),
% 0.46/0.63     ['proof']).
% 0.46/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.63  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------