TSTP Solution File: GRP148-1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GRP148-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:09:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 48.86s 6.59s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GRP148-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 06:16:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 48.86/6.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 48.86/6.59  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(a,b) != greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c1, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(a,b) != greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c),
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 48.86/6.59  	greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3) = greatest_lower_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c3, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c4, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c5, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X2 != X0 | X3 != least_upper_bound(X0,X1) | X4 != X0 | least_upper_bound(a,b) != X4,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(lazy_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X2 = X0).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c6, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X3 != least_upper_bound(X0,X1) | X4 != X0 | least_upper_bound(a,b) != X4,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c7, axiom,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(X5,least_upper_bound(X6,X7)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X5,X6),X7)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X5,X6),X7)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c8, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X4 != X0 | least_upper_bound(a,b) != X4,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c9, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c10, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X8 != least_upper_bound(X5,least_upper_bound(X6,X7)) | X3 != X8,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c6, c7])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c11, axiom,
% 48.86/6.59  	c = least_upper_bound(b,c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(X6,X7) = least_upper_bound(b,c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c12, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X3 != X8,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c13, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c14, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X9 != c | X8 != least_upper_bound(X5,X9),
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X9 = c).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c15, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X8 != least_upper_bound(X5,X9),
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c14])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c16, axiom,
% 48.86/6.59  	c = least_upper_bound(a,c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(X5,X9) = least_upper_bound(a,c)).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c17, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c18, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c19, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X10 != c | X8 != X10,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X10 = c).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c20, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	X8 != X10,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a6])], [c19])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X8 = X10).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c21, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a7])], [c20])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X3 = X8).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c22, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a8])], [c12])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	X4 = X0).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c23, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(a,b) != X4,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c8])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 48.86/6.59  	least_upper_bound(a,b) = X4).
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c24, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c23])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  cnf(c25, plain,
% 48.86/6.59  	$false,
% 48.86/6.59  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X0, least_upper_bound(a,b)),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X1, c),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X4, least_upper_bound(a,b)),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X2, least_upper_bound(a,b)),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X3, c),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X5, a),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X6, b),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X7, c),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X8, c),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X9, c),
% 48.86/6.59  		bind(X10, c)
% 48.86/6.59  	],
% 48.86/6.59  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10])).
% 48.86/6.59  
% 48.86/6.59  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------