TSTP Solution File: GRP148-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP148-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ydtJgYPnwH true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:22 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.69s 1.19s
% Output : Refutation 3.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : GRP148-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ydtJgYPnwH true
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 20:02:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 3.69/1.19 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 3.69/1.19 % done 390 iterations in 0.396s
% 3.69/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 3.69/1.19 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.69/1.19 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(ax_lub1c_2, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ b @ c ) = ( c ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ b @ c) = (c))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_lub1c_2])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(glb_absorbtion, axiom,
% 3.69/1.19 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, (((greatest_lower_bound @ b @ c) = (b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(symmetry_of_glb, axiom,
% 3.69/1.19 (( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( greatest_lower_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_glb])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain, (((b) = (greatest_lower_bound @ c @ b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(ax_lub1c_1, axiom, (( least_upper_bound @ a @ c ) = ( c ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ c) = (c))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax_lub1c_1])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 3.69/1.19 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl45, plain, (((c) = (least_upper_bound @ c @ a))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(lub_absorbtion, axiom,
% 3.69/1.19 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lub_absorbtion])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(associativity_of_lub, axiom,
% 3.69/1.19 (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 3.69/1.19 ( least_upper_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 3.69/1.19 = (least_upper_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_lub])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl70, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @
% 3.69/1.19 (least_upper_bound @ X0 @
% 3.69/1.19 (greatest_lower_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))
% 3.69/1.19 = (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2295, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ c @
% 3.69/1.19 (least_upper_bound @ a @ (greatest_lower_bound @ c @ X0)))
% 3.69/1.19 = (least_upper_bound @ c @ a))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl45, zip_derived_cl70])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl45, plain, (((c) = (least_upper_bound @ c @ a))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2329, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ c @
% 3.69/1.19 (least_upper_bound @ a @ (greatest_lower_bound @ c @ X0))) = (
% 3.69/1.19 c))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2295, zip_derived_cl45])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2755, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (((least_upper_bound @ c @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b)) = (c))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl38, zip_derived_cl2329])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [glb_absorbtion])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2778, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (((greatest_lower_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b) @ c)
% 3.69/1.19 = (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2755, zip_derived_cl42])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_glb])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2887, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (((greatest_lower_bound @ c @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))
% 3.69/1.19 = (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2778, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(prove_ax_lub1c, conjecture,
% 3.69/1.19 (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) @ c ) =
% 3.69/1.19 ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ))).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 3.69/1.19 (( greatest_lower_bound @ ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b ) @ c ) !=
% 3.69/1.19 ( least_upper_bound @ a @ b )),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ax_lub1c])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (((greatest_lower_bound @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b) @ c)
% 3.69/1.19 != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 3.69/1.19 ((greatest_lower_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_glb])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 3.69/1.19 (((greatest_lower_bound @ c @ (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))
% 3.69/1.19 != (least_upper_bound @ a @ b))),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 3.69/1.19 thf(zip_derived_cl2904, plain, ($false),
% 3.69/1.19 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 3.69/1.19 [zip_derived_cl2887, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 3.69/1.19
% 3.69/1.19 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.69/1.19
% 3.69/1.19
% 3.69/1.19 % Terminating...
% 3.69/1.27 % Runner terminated.
% 3.69/1.29 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------