TSTP Solution File: GRP146-1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GRP146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:09:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.39s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13  % Problem  : GRP146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.05/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 20:57:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 0.20/0.39  	c != least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c1, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	c != least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c),
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 0.20/0.39  	least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(a,b),c) = least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c3, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c4, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c5, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	X3 != least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) | c != X3,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c6, axiom,
% 0.20/0.39  	c = least_upper_bound(b,c)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	least_upper_bound(X1,X2) = least_upper_bound(b,c)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c7, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	c != X3,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c8, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c9, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	X4 != c | X3 != least_upper_bound(X0,X4),
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	X4 = c).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c10, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	X3 != least_upper_bound(X0,X4),
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c9])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c11, axiom,
% 0.20/0.39  	c = least_upper_bound(a,c)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	least_upper_bound(X0,X4) = least_upper_bound(a,c)).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c12, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c13, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c14, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	X5 != c | X3 != X5,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c10, c11])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	X5 = c).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c15, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	X3 != X5,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c14])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	X3 = X5).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c16, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c15])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 0.20/0.39  	c = X3).
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c17, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a6])], [c7])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  cnf(c18, plain,
% 0.20/0.39  	$false,
% 0.20/0.39  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X0, a),
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X1, b),
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X2, c),
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X3, c),
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X4, c),
% 0.20/0.39  		bind(X5, c)
% 0.20/0.39  	],
% 0.20/0.39  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6])).
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------