TSTP Solution File: GRP146-1 by Matita---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Matita---1.0
% Problem  : GRP146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:29:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GRP146-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 21:04:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.33  21411: Facts:
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   2, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   3, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   4, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8)
% 0.12/0.33            [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   5, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10
% 0.12/0.33            [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   6, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13
% 0.12/0.33            [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   7, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18)
% 0.12/0.33            =?=
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18
% 0.12/0.33            [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   8, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22)
% 0.12/0.33            =?=
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22
% 0.12/0.33            [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   9, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  10, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26
% 0.12/0.33            [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  11, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28
% 0.12/0.33            [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  12, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31
% 0.12/0.33            [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  13, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36)
% 0.12/0.33            =<=
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36)
% 0.12/0.33            [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  14, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40)
% 0.12/0.33            =<=
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40)
% 0.12/0.33            [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  15, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44
% 0.12/0.33            =<=
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44)
% 0.12/0.33            [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  16, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48
% 0.12/0.33            =<=
% 0.12/0.33            greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48)
% 0.12/0.33            [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  17, {_}: least_upper_bound a c =>= c [] by ax_lub1a_1
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :  18, {_}: least_upper_bound b c =>= c [] by ax_lub1a_2
% 0.12/0.33  21411: Goal:
% 0.12/0.33  21411:  Id :   1, {_}:
% 0.12/0.33            least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound a b) c =>= c
% 0.12/0.33            [] by prove_ax_lub1a
% 0.19/0.48  Statistics :
% 0.19/0.48  Max weight : 16
% 0.19/0.48  Found proof, 0.145940s
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48  Id :  18, {_}: least_upper_bound b c =>= c [] by ax_lub1a_2
% 0.19/0.48  Id :  17, {_}: least_upper_bound a c =>= c [] by ax_lub1a_1
% 0.19/0.48  Id :   8, {_}: least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22) =<= least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22
% 0.19/0.48  Id :   6, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14
% 0.19/0.48  Id :  59, {_}: least_upper_bound ?145 (least_upper_bound ?146 ?147) =?= least_upper_bound ?146 (least_upper_bound ?147 ?145) [147, 146, 145] by Super 6 with 8 at 3
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 407, {_}: least_upper_bound a (least_upper_bound c ?698) =>= least_upper_bound c ?698 [698] by Super 8 with 17 at 1,3
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 410, {_}: least_upper_bound a (least_upper_bound ?704 c) =>= least_upper_bound c ?704 [704] by Super 407 with 6 at 2,2
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 1706, {_}: c =?= c [] by Demod 1705 with 18 at 2
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 1705, {_}: least_upper_bound b c =>= c [] by Demod 1704 with 6 at 2
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 1704, {_}: least_upper_bound c b =>= c [] by Demod 1703 with 410 at 2
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 1703, {_}: least_upper_bound a (least_upper_bound b c) =>= c [] by Demod 1702 with 59 at 2
% 0.19/0.48  Id : 1702, {_}: least_upper_bound c (least_upper_bound a b) =>= c [] by Demod 1 with 6 at 2
% 0.19/0.48  Id :   1, {_}: least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound a b) c =>= c [] by prove_ax_lub1a
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48  21412: solved /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.147459 using kbo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------