TSTP Solution File: GRP143-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP143-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:40:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.35s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  17   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > least_upper_bound > greatest_lower_bound > #nlpp > inverse > identity > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(greatest_lower_bound,type,
    greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(least_upper_bound,type,
    least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(f_99,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X,X) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_93,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X,greatest_lower_bound(Y,Z)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X,Y),Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X,Y) = greatest_lower_bound(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),a) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X_17] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X_17,X_17) = X_17 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_99]) ).

tff(c_219,plain,
    ! [X_48,Y_49,Z_50] : ( greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X_48,Y_49),Z_50) = greatest_lower_bound(X_48,greatest_lower_bound(Y_49,Z_50)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_283,plain,
    ! [X_17,Z_50] : ( greatest_lower_bound(X_17,greatest_lower_bound(X_17,Z_50)) = greatest_lower_bound(X_17,Z_50) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_18,c_219]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [Y_7,X_6] : ( greatest_lower_bound(Y_7,X_6) = greatest_lower_bound(X_6,Y_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_10,Y_11,Z_12] : ( greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X_10,Y_11),Z_12) = greatest_lower_bound(X_10,greatest_lower_bound(Y_11,Z_12)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),a) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_33,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,greatest_lower_bound(b,a)) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_32]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(a,greatest_lower_bound(a,b)) != greatest_lower_bound(a,b),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_33]) ).

tff(c_343,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_283,c_34]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : GRP143-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 21:53:45 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.35/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.80  
% 3.35/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.41/1.82  
% 3.41/1.82  Inference rules
% 3.41/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.41/1.82  #Ref     : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Sup     : 77
% 3.41/1.82  #Fact    : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Define  : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Split   : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Chain   : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Close   : 0
% 3.41/1.82  
% 3.41/1.82  Ordering : KBO
% 3.41/1.82  
% 3.41/1.82  Simplification rules
% 3.41/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.41/1.82  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Demod        : 23
% 3.41/1.82  #Tautology    : 54
% 3.41/1.82  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.41/1.82  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.41/1.82  
% 3.41/1.82  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.41/1.82  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.41/1.82  
% 3.41/1.82  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.41/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.44/1.83  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 3.44/1.83  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.44/1.83  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.44/1.83  Main loop            : 0.30
% 3.44/1.83  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.44/1.83  Reduction            : 0.11
% 3.44/1.83  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.44/1.83  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.44/1.83  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.44/1.83  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.44/1.83  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.44/1.83  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.44/1.83  Total                : 0.81
% 3.44/1.83  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.44/1.83  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.44/1.83  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.44/1.83  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------