TSTP Solution File: GRP140-1 by Matita---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Matita---1.0
% Problem : GRP140-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:29:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.10s 1.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : GRP140-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.05/0.13 % Command : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 10:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Facts:
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 2, {_}: multiply identity ?2 =>= ?2 [2] by left_identity ?2
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 3, {_}: multiply (inverse ?4) ?4 =>= identity [4] by left_inverse ?4
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 4, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 multiply (multiply ?6 ?7) ?8 =?= multiply ?6 (multiply ?7 ?8)
% 0.12/0.34 [8, 7, 6] by associativity ?6 ?7 ?8
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 5, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10
% 0.12/0.34 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 6, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13
% 0.12/0.34 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 7, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18)
% 0.12/0.34 =?=
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18
% 0.12/0.34 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 8, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound ?20 (least_upper_bound ?21 ?22)
% 0.12/0.34 =?=
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound (least_upper_bound ?20 ?21) ?22
% 0.12/0.34 [22, 21, 20] by associativity_of_lub ?20 ?21 ?22
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 9, {_}: least_upper_bound ?24 ?24 =>= ?24 [24] by idempotence_of_lub ?24
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 10, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26
% 0.12/0.34 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 11, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28
% 0.12/0.34 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 12, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound ?31 (least_upper_bound ?31 ?32) =>= ?31
% 0.12/0.34 [32, 31] by glb_absorbtion ?31 ?32
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 13, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 multiply ?34 (least_upper_bound ?35 ?36)
% 0.12/0.34 =<=
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound (multiply ?34 ?35) (multiply ?34 ?36)
% 0.12/0.34 [36, 35, 34] by monotony_lub1 ?34 ?35 ?36
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 14, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 multiply ?38 (greatest_lower_bound ?39 ?40)
% 0.12/0.34 =<=
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?38 ?39) (multiply ?38 ?40)
% 0.12/0.34 [40, 39, 38] by monotony_glb1 ?38 ?39 ?40
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 15, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 multiply (least_upper_bound ?42 ?43) ?44
% 0.12/0.34 =<=
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound (multiply ?42 ?44) (multiply ?43 ?44)
% 0.12/0.34 [44, 43, 42] by monotony_lub2 ?42 ?43 ?44
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 16, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 multiply (greatest_lower_bound ?46 ?47) ?48
% 0.12/0.34 =<=
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound (multiply ?46 ?48) (multiply ?47 ?48)
% 0.12/0.34 [48, 47, 46] by monotony_glb2 ?46 ?47 ?48
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 17, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a c =>= c [] by ax_glb1c_1
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 18, {_}: greatest_lower_bound b c =>= c [] by ax_glb1c_2
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Goal:
% 0.12/0.34 13680: Id : 1, {_}:
% 0.12/0.34 least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound a b) c
% 0.12/0.34 =>=
% 0.12/0.34 greatest_lower_bound a b
% 0.12/0.34 [] by prove_ax_glb1c
% 3.10/1.12 Statistics :
% 3.10/1.12 Max weight : 16
% 3.10/1.12 Found proof, 0.775268s
% 3.10/1.12 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.10/1.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 18, {_}: greatest_lower_bound b c =>= c [] by ax_glb1c_2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 11, {_}: least_upper_bound ?28 (greatest_lower_bound ?28 ?29) =>= ?28 [29, 28] by lub_absorbtion ?28 ?29
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 134, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?450 (least_upper_bound ?450 ?451) =>= ?450 [451, 450] by glb_absorbtion ?450 ?451
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 17, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a c =>= c [] by ax_glb1c_1
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 10, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?26 ?26 =>= ?26 [26] by idempotence_of_gld ?26
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 7, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?16 (greatest_lower_bound ?17 ?18) =?= greatest_lower_bound (greatest_lower_bound ?16 ?17) ?18 [18, 17, 16] by associativity_of_glb ?16 ?17 ?18
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 5, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?10 ?11 =?= greatest_lower_bound ?11 ?10 [11, 10] by symmetry_of_glb ?10 ?11
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 116, {_}: least_upper_bound ?395 (greatest_lower_bound ?395 ?396) =>= ?395 [396, 395] by lub_absorbtion ?395 ?396
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 6, {_}: least_upper_bound ?13 ?14 =?= least_upper_bound ?14 ?13 [14, 13] by symmetry_of_lub ?13 ?14
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 117, {_}: least_upper_bound ?398 (greatest_lower_bound ?399 ?398) =>= ?398 [399, 398] by Super 116 with 5 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 102, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?351 (greatest_lower_bound ?351 ?352) =>= greatest_lower_bound ?351 ?352 [352, 351] by Super 7 with 10 at 1,3
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 310, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (greatest_lower_bound c ?810) =>= greatest_lower_bound c ?810 [810] by Super 7 with 17 at 1,3
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 393, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (greatest_lower_bound ?898 c) =>= greatest_lower_bound c ?898 [898] by Super 310 with 5 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 399, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (greatest_lower_bound ?907 (greatest_lower_bound ?908 c)) =>= greatest_lower_bound c (greatest_lower_bound ?907 ?908) [908, 907] by Super 393 with 7 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 3195, {_}: greatest_lower_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a ?4185) =>= greatest_lower_bound a (greatest_lower_bound ?4185 c) [4185] by Super 102 with 399 at 2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 311, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a (greatest_lower_bound ?812 c) =>= greatest_lower_bound c ?812 [812] by Super 310 with 5 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 3247, {_}: greatest_lower_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a ?4185) =>= greatest_lower_bound c ?4185 [4185] by Demod 3195 with 311 at 3
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13599, {_}: least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound a ?12867) (greatest_lower_bound c ?12867) =>= greatest_lower_bound a ?12867 [12867] by Super 117 with 3247 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 135, {_}: greatest_lower_bound ?453 (least_upper_bound ?454 ?453) =>= ?453 [454, 453] by Super 134 with 6 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13604, {_}: least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound ?12876 c)) c =>= greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound ?12876 c) [12876] by Super 13599 with 135 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13862, {_}: least_upper_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound ?13088 c)) =>= greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound ?13088 c) [13088] by Demod 13604 with 6 at 2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 285, {_}: least_upper_bound b c =>= b [] by Super 11 with 18 at 2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13867, {_}: least_upper_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a b) =<= greatest_lower_bound a (least_upper_bound b c) [] by Super 13862 with 285 at 2,2,2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13919, {_}: least_upper_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a b) =>= greatest_lower_bound a b [] by Demod 13867 with 285 at 2,3
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 13998, {_}: greatest_lower_bound a b === greatest_lower_bound a b [] by Demod 290 with 13919 at 2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 290, {_}: least_upper_bound c (greatest_lower_bound a b) =>= greatest_lower_bound a b [] by Demod 1 with 6 at 2
% 3.10/1.12 Id : 1, {_}: least_upper_bound (greatest_lower_bound a b) c =>= greatest_lower_bound a b [] by prove_ax_glb1c
% 3.10/1.12 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 3.10/1.12 13683: solved /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.777083 using nrkbo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------