TSTP Solution File: GRP138-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GRP138-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:51:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.74s 0.61s
% Output : Refutation 1.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9820,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9795,f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
greatest_lower_bound(a,b) != least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_glb1a) ).
fof(f9795,plain,
greatest_lower_bound(a,b) = least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c),
inference(superposition,[],[f26,f9696]) ).
fof(f9696,plain,
c = greatest_lower_bound(c,greatest_lower_bound(a,b)),
inference(superposition,[],[f9433,f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
b = least_upper_bound(c,b),
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f17]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
b = least_upper_bound(b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1a_2) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_lub) ).
fof(f9433,plain,
! [X0] : c = greatest_lower_bound(c,greatest_lower_bound(a,least_upper_bound(c,X0))),
inference(superposition,[],[f126,f48]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
c = greatest_lower_bound(c,a),
inference(superposition,[],[f29,f16]) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
a = least_upper_bound(a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1a_1) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[],[f11,f5]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',glb_absorbtion) ).
fof(f126,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2))),
inference(superposition,[],[f6,f11]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_glb) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[],[f10,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lub_absorbtion) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : GRP138-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 04:20:34 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 % (9748)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.39 % (9751)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.39 % (9751)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (9750)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (9754)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (9753)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (9752)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (9755)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.39 % (9749)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 TRYING [3]
% 0.15/0.40 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.40 TRYING [2]
% 0.22/0.41 TRYING [4]
% 0.22/0.42 TRYING [3]
% 0.22/0.46 TRYING [4]
% 0.22/0.47 TRYING [5]
% 0.22/0.57 TRYING [5]
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)First to succeed.
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.74/0.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.74/0.61 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)------------------------------
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.74/0.61
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Memory used [KB]: 3505
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Time elapsed: 0.227 s
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)Instructions burned: 526 (million)
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)------------------------------
% 1.74/0.61 % (9751)------------------------------
% 1.74/0.61 % (9748)Success in time 0.235 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------