TSTP Solution File: GRP136-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GRP136-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:56:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.92s 2.11s
% Output   : Refutation 1.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   5 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    a != b,
    file('GRP136-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,plain,
    b != a,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[1])]),
    [iquote('copy,1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(35,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = b,
    file('GRP136-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(36,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(a,b) = a,
    file('GRP136-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(37,plain,
    b = a,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[36]),35]),
    [iquote('copy,36,demod,35')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[37,2]),
    [iquote('binary,37.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP136-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 05:48:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.92/2.11  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.92/2.11  The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 1.92/2.11  Wed Jul 27 05:48:09 2022
% 1.92/2.11  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 5531.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.92/2.11  set(auto).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.92/2.11  clear(print_given).
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  list(usable).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] A=A.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(identity,X)=X.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(inverse(X),X)=identity.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z)=multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] greatest_lower_bound(X,Y)=greatest_lower_bound(Y,X).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(X,Y)=least_upper_bound(Y,X).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] greatest_lower_bound(X,greatest_lower_bound(Y,Z))=greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X,Y),Z).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(X,least_upper_bound(Y,Z))=least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X,Y),Z).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(X,X)=X.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] greatest_lower_bound(X,X)=X.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(X,greatest_lower_bound(X,Y))=X.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] greatest_lower_bound(X,least_upper_bound(X,Y))=X.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(X,least_upper_bound(Y,Z))=least_upper_bound(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(X,greatest_lower_bound(Y,Z))=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(least_upper_bound(Y,Z),X)=least_upper_bound(multiply(Y,X),multiply(Z,X)).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] multiply(greatest_lower_bound(Y,Z),X)=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(Y,X),multiply(Z,X)).
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(a,b)=b.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] least_upper_bound(a,b)=a.
% 1.92/2.11  0 [] a!=b.
% 1.92/2.11  end_of_list.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.92/2.11  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.92/2.11     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ------------> process usable:
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] b!=a.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ------------> process sos:
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] A=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 4 [] multiply(identity,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 5 [new_demod,4] multiply(identity,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] multiply(inverse(A),A)=identity.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] multiply(inverse(A),A)=identity.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 8 [] multiply(multiply(A,B),C)=multiply(A,multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] multiply(multiply(A,B),C)=multiply(A,multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] greatest_lower_bound(A,B)=greatest_lower_bound(B,A).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 11 [] least_upper_bound(A,B)=least_upper_bound(B,A).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 13 [copy,12,flip.1] greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(A,B),C)=greatest_lower_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(A,B),C)=greatest_lower_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 16 [copy,15,flip.1] least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(A,B),C)=least_upper_bound(A,least_upper_bound(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(A,B),C)=least_upper_bound(A,least_upper_bound(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 18 [] least_upper_bound(A,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 19 [new_demod,18] least_upper_bound(A,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 20 [] greatest_lower_bound(A,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 21 [new_demod,20] greatest_lower_bound(A,A)=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 22 [] least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B))=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 23 [new_demod,22] least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B))=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 24 [] greatest_lower_bound(A,least_upper_bound(A,B))=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 25 [new_demod,24
% 1.92/2.11  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.92/2.11  ] greatest_lower_bound(A,least_upper_bound(A,B))=A.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 26 [] multiply(A,least_upper_bound(B,C))=least_upper_bound(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 27 [new_demod,26] multiply(A,least_upper_bound(B,C))=least_upper_bound(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 28 [] multiply(A,greatest_lower_bound(B,C))=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 29 [new_demod,28] multiply(A,greatest_lower_bound(B,C))=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 30 [] multiply(least_upper_bound(A,B),C)=least_upper_bound(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 31 [new_demod,30] multiply(least_upper_bound(A,B),C)=least_upper_bound(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 32 [] multiply(greatest_lower_bound(A,B),C)=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 33 [new_demod,32] multiply(greatest_lower_bound(A,B),C)=greatest_lower_bound(multiply(A,C),multiply(B,C)).
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 34 [] least_upper_bound(a,b)=b.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 35 [new_demod,34] least_upper_bound(a,b)=b.
% 1.92/2.11  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 37 [copy,36,demod,35] b=a.
% 1.92/2.11  ---> New Demodulator: 38 [new_demod,37] b=a.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 39 [binary,37.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.92/2.11  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.92/2.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.92/2.11  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ============ end of search ============
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.92/2.11  clauses given                  0
% 1.92/2.11  clauses generated              0
% 1.92/2.11  clauses kept                  19
% 1.92/2.11  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.92/2.11  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.92/2.11  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.92/2.11  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.92/2.11  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.92/2.11  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.92/2.11  
% 1.92/2.11  Process 5531 finished Wed Jul 27 05:48:10 2022
% 1.92/2.11  Otter interrupted
% 1.92/2.11  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------