TSTP Solution File: GRP136-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GRP136-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 00:11:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GRP136-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 02:33:20 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.50/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.50/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.50/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.50/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 % File : GRP136-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.50/0.60 % Domain : Group Theory (Lattice Ordered)
% 0.50/0.60 % Problem : Prove anti-symmetry axiom using the LUB transformation
% 0.50/0.60 % Version : [Fuc94] (equality) axioms.
% 0.50/0.60 % English : This problem proves the original anti-symmetry axiom from the
% 0.50/0.60 % equational axiomatization.
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 % Refs : [Fuc94] Fuchs (1994), The Application of Goal-Orientated Heuri
% 0.50/0.60 % : [Sch95] Schulz (1995), Explanation Based Learning for Distribu
% 0.50/0.60 % Source : [Sch95]
% 0.50/0.60 % Names : ax_antisyma [Sch95]
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.04 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.05 v6.3.0, 0.06 v6.2.0, 0.07 v6.1.0, 0.06 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.1.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.09 v4.0.1, 0.07 v4.0.0, 0.08 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.50/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.50/0.60 % Number of literals : 18 ( 18 equ; 1 neg)
% 0.50/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.50/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.50/0.60 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.60 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.60 % Number of variables : 33 ( 2 sgn)
% 0.50/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 % Comments : ORDERING LPO inverse > product > greatest_lower_bound >
% 0.50/0.60 % least_upper_bound > identity > a > b
% 0.50/0.60 % Bugfixes : v1.2.1 - Duplicate axioms in GRP004-2.ax removed.
% 0.50/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 %----Include equality group theory axioms
% 0.50/0.60 include('Axioms/GRP004-0.ax').
% 0.50/0.60 %----Include Lattice ordered group (equality) axioms
% 0.50/0.60 include('Axioms/GRP004-2.ax').
% 0.50/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 cnf(ax_antisyma_1,hypothesis,
% 0.50/0.60 least_upper_bound(a,b) = b ).
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 cnf(ax_antisyma_2,hypothesis,
% 0.50/0.60 least_upper_bound(a,b) = a ).
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 cnf(prove_ax_antisyma,negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.60 a != b ).
% 0.50/0.60
% 0.50/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.50/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.60 %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.50/0.60 %VarNum:72(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.50/0.60 %MaxLitNum:1
% 0.50/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.50/0.61 %SharedTerms:7
% 0.50/0.61 %goalClause: 28
% 0.50/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.50/0.61 [28]~E(a2,a1)
% 0.50/0.61 [11]E(f3(a1,a2),a1)
% 0.50/0.61 [12]E(f3(a1,a2),a2)
% 0.50/0.61 [13]E(f7(a4,x131),x131)
% 0.50/0.61 [14]E(f5(x141,x141),x141)
% 0.50/0.61 [15]E(f3(x151,x151),x151)
% 0.50/0.61 [16]E(f7(f6(x161),x161),a4)
% 0.50/0.61 [17]E(f5(x171,x172),f5(x172,x171))
% 0.50/0.61 [18]E(f3(x181,x182),f3(x182,x181))
% 0.50/0.61 [19]E(f5(x191,f3(x191,x192)),x191)
% 0.50/0.61 [20]E(f3(x201,f5(x201,x202)),x201)
% 0.50/0.61 [21]E(f5(f5(x211,x212),x213),f5(x211,f5(x212,x213)))
% 0.50/0.61 [22]E(f3(f3(x221,x222),x223),f3(x221,f3(x222,x223)))
% 0.50/0.61 [23]E(f7(f7(x231,x232),x233),f7(x231,f7(x232,x233)))
% 0.50/0.61 [24]E(f5(f7(x241,x242),f7(x241,x243)),f7(x241,f5(x242,x243)))
% 0.50/0.61 [25]E(f3(f7(x251,x252),f7(x251,x253)),f7(x251,f3(x252,x253)))
% 0.50/0.61 [26]E(f5(f7(x261,x262),f7(x263,x262)),f7(f5(x261,x263),x262))
% 0.50/0.61 [27]E(f3(f7(x271,x272),f7(x273,x272)),f7(f3(x271,x273),x272))
% 0.50/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.50/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.50/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.50/0.61 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41,x43),f3(x42,x43))
% 0.50/0.61 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x53,x51),f3(x53,x52))
% 0.50/0.61 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f7(x61,x63),f7(x62,x63))
% 0.50/0.61 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f7(x73,x71),f7(x73,x72))
% 0.50/0.61 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.50/0.61 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.50/0.61 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f6(x101),f6(x102))
% 0.50/0.61
% 0.50/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.61 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.50/0.61 (E(a2,f3(a1,a2))),
% 0.50/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,2])).
% 0.50/0.61 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.50/0.61 ($false),
% 0.50/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,11,29,3]),
% 0.50/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------