TSTP Solution File: GRP134-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP134-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:39:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP22738/GRP/GRP134-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 234] [nf = 8] [nu = 12] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 566] [nf = 550] [nu = 30] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1259] [nf = 1092] [nu = 93] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3678] [nf = 4622] [nu = 165] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7393] [nf = 8152] [nu = 405] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19364] [nf = 27474] [nu = 645] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36255] [nf = 46796] [nu = 1317] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 93882] [nf = 143958] [nu = 1989] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 169765] [nf = 241120] [nu = 4101] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 436144] [nf = 711498] [nu = 6213] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 773147] [nf = 1181876] [nu = 11973] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 1996230] [nf = 3487070] [nu = 17733] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 3489841] [nf = 5792264] [nu = 35397] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 46 secs [nr = 9197596] [nf = 16572210] [nu = 53061] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 82 secs [nr = 15967111] [nf = 27352156] [nu = 100677] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23924169] [nf = 43767288] [nu = 114519] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23924350] [nf = 43767296] [nu = 114543] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23924702] [nf = 43767862] [nu = 114567] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23925906] [nf = 43768428] [nu = 114639] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23930664] [nf = 43778090] [nu = 114711] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 23949494] [nf = 43787754] [nu = 114975] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 24053375] [nf = 44080736] [nu = 115239] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 127 secs [nr = 24938048] [nf = 44373718] [nu = 115983] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 166 secs [nr = 37206397] [nf = 57246326] [nu = 116727] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 137392808
% resolvents: 70691623 factors: 66701185
% Number of unit clauses generated: 188415
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.14
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 39 [2] = 6 [4] = 3
% Total = 48
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 188415 [2] = 52276716 [3] = 42946029 [4] = 26090143 [5] = 10666508 [6] = 4138052
% [7] = 1013376 [8] = 73569
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)9
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)29
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 48
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 312644965
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1580810
% Number of successful unifications: 137392808
% Number of unification failures: 435051035
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 304236240
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 15808379
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 26398857
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 119277
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 32
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 100
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.32
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 572443843
% ConstructUnitClause() = 119286
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.18 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 457976
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 306 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------