%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP134-2.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:39:21 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.08s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10075/GRP/GRP134-2.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 23] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 71] [nf = 8] [nu = 2] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 189] [nf = 200] [nu = 6] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 414] [nf = 392] [nu = 25] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1225] [nf = 1564] [nu = 47] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2432] [nf = 2736] [nu = 125] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6387] [nf = 8972] [nu = 203] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 11838] [nf = 15208] [nu = 425] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 30577] [nf = 46212] [nu = 647] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 54900] [nf = 77216] [nu = 1349] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 140935] [nf = 226108] [nu = 2051] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 248506] [nf = 375000] [nu = 3969] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 640653] [nf = 1103860] [nu = 5887] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 1115552] [nf = 1832720] [nu = 11773] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 2941939] [nf = 5234476] [nu = 17659] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 25 secs [nr = 5092550] [nf = 8636232] [nu = 33529] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6399164] [nf = 11091726] [nu = 33531] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6399218] [nf = 11091734] [nu = 33537] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6399356] [nf = 11091950] [nu = 33543] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6399799] [nf = 11092168] [nu = 33565] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6402825] [nf = 11095940] [nu = 33587] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 6425404] [nf = 11099712] [nu = 33665] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 6712470] [nf = 11312978] [nu = 33751] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 39 secs [nr = 9548053] [nf = 11526802] [nu = 45517] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 115 secs [nr = 35815470] [nf = 34351158] [nu = 57315] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 158701185
% 	resolvents: 113836525	factors: 44864660
% Number of unit clauses generated: 128563
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.08
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14	[2] = 1		[4] = 1		
% Total = 16
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 128563	[2] = 20026260	[3] = 56349814	[4] = 56130128	[5] = 22671953	[6] = 3394467	
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)6
% [2] greater_2		(+)3	(-)0
% [3] next_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [4] product_3		(+)0	(-)2
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)8	(-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 16
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 513528920
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 2394857
% Number of successful unifications: 158701185
% Number of unification failures: 334895913
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 129573616
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 25689462
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 96148
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 19
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 31
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.61
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 493597098
% ConstructUnitClause() = 96150
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.12 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 529004
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------