TSTP Solution File: GRP133-2.003 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP133-2.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:36:32 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4297/GRP/GRP133-2.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 71] [nf = 8] [nu = 2] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 189] [nf = 152] [nu = 6] [ut = 15]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 414] [nf = 296] [nu = 25] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1129] [nf = 1360] [nu = 47] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2240] [nf = 2424] [nu = 125] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5979] [nf = 8136] [nu = 203] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11214] [nf = 13848] [nu = 425] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28905] [nf = 43448] [nu = 647] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52180] [nf = 73048] [nu = 1349] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 135407] [nf = 215256] [nu = 2051] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 240170] [nf = 357464] [nu = 3969] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 618949] [nf = 1066392] [nu = 5887] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1080480] [nf = 1775320] [nu = 11773] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 2867003] [nf = 5088664] [nu = 17659] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 4977750] [nf = 8402008] [nu = 33529] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6398178] [nf = 11189848] [nu = 33531] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6398232] [nf = 11189856] [nu = 33537] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6398370] [nf = 11190024] [nu = 33543] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6398757] [nf = 11190194] [nu = 33565] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6401519] [nf = 11193766] [nu = 33587] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6423434] [nf = 11197338] [nu = 33665] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6706812] [nf = 11401136] [nu = 33751] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 38 secs [nr = 9523137] [nf = 11605492] [nu = 45517] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 114 secs [nr = 35584716] [nf = 34298022] [nu = 57315] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 158969430
% resolvents: 114140668 factors: 44828762
% Number of unit clauses generated: 131287
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.08
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14 [2] = 1 [4] = 1
% Total = 16
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 131287 [2] = 20265324 [3] = 56465943 [4] = 56069322 [5] = 22654876 [6] = 3382678
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)6
% [2] greater_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)8 (-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 16
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 515440446
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2371307
% Number of successful unifications: 158969430
% Number of unification failures: 338199897
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 128129267
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 25711454
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 98644
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 19
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 31
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.61
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 497169327
% ConstructUnitClause() = 98646
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.08 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 529898
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------