TSTP Solution File: GRP132-1.002 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GRP132-1.002 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:33:41 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13122/GRP/GRP132-1.002+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 22] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 54] [nf = 14] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 266] [nf = 46] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 622] [nf = 78] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 1842] [nf = 398] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 3926] [nf = 718] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 6010] [nf = 1038] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 8094] [nf = 1358] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 10178] [nf = 1678] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 12262] [nf = 1998] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 14346] [nf = 2318] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 16430] [nf = 2638] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 18514] [nf = 2958] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 20598] [nf = 3278] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 22682] [nf = 3598] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 24766] [nf = 3918] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 26850] [nf = 4238] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 28934] [nf = 4558] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 31018] [nf = 4878] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 33102] [nf = 5198] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 35186] [nf = 5518] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 37270] [nf = 5838] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 39354] [nf = 6158] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 41438] [nf = 6478] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 43522] [nf = 6798] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 45606] [nf = 7118] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 47690] [nf = 7438] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 49774] [nf = 7758] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 51858] [nf = 8078] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 51864] [nf = 8078] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 51880] [nf = 8084] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 51912] [nf = 8092] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 52184] [nf = 8148] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 53924] [nf = 8204] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 61896] [nf = 11752] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 161472] [nf = 22360] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 315304] [nf = 67548] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1177704] [nf = 447056] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 18 secs [nr = 9941968] [nf = 995204] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 
% 11 ...
% 	t = 113 secs [nr = 49020712] [nf = 27245200] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 190317288
% 	resolvents: 152281027	factors: 38036261
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		
% Total = 4
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 42994172	[3] = 62501742	[4] = 43376255	[5] = 29710252	[6] = 10187260	[7] = 1547607	
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1	(+)2	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)2
% [2] product_3		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)2	(-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 4
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 548299747
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 10581510
% Number of successful unifications: 190317288
% Number of unification failures: 213191302
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 66262593
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 36655583
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 39
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 403508590
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 634391
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------