TSTP Solution File: GRP131-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP131-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:33:28 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5340/GRP/GRP131-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 234] [nf = 6] [nu = 12] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 394] [nf = 12] [nu = 24] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 834] [nf = 42] [nu = 36] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1284] [nf = 72] [nu = 48] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2096] [nf = 104] [nu = 60] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9823] [nf = 206] [nu = 72] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 434568] [nf = 308] [nu = 84] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1833749] [nf = 163642] [nu = 96] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 82019986
% resolvents: 81521849 factors: 498137
% Number of unit clauses generated: 412116
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.50
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 39 [2] = 6
% Total = 45
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 412116 [2] = 15660474 [3] = 27312092 [4] = 18057089 [5] = 15719161 [6] = 4326722
% [7] = 478913 [8] = 53419
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)6
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)26
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 45
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 387902634
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1890520
% Number of successful unifications: 82019986
% Number of unification failures: 956385156
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1544572
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 633351
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 10
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 412014
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 27
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 91
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.30
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1038405142
% ConstructUnitClause() = 412020
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.47 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 273400
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------