TSTP Solution File: GRP130-3.003 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP130-3.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:28:35 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9307/GRP/GRP130-3.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 106] [nf = 10] [nu = 4] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 251] [nf = 164] [nu = 8] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 472] [nf = 318] [nu = 12] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1165] [nf = 1344] [nu = 16] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2146] [nf = 2370] [nu = 20] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5607] [nf = 8096] [nu = 24] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10220] [nf = 13822] [nu = 28] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27177] [nf = 40616] [nu = 32] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48742] [nf = 67410] [nu = 36] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 124219] [nf = 184176] [nu = 40] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 218128] [nf = 300942] [nu = 44] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 539085] [nf = 797840] [nu = 48] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 933770] [nf = 1294738] [nu = 52] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 2277135] [nf = 3381944] [nu = 56] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 3915412] [nf = 5469150] [nu = 60] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6856811] [nf = 10007782] [nu = 60] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6856884] [nf = 10007792] [nu = 64] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6857059] [nf = 10007970] [nu = 68] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6857681] [nf = 10008256] [nu = 72] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6864427] [nf = 10011954] [nu = 316] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 6884050] [nf = 10016410] [nu = 560] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7104782] [nf = 10194026] [nu = 804] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 9294099] [nf = 10403115] [nu = 1048] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 113 secs [nr = 35905487] [nf = 32726873] [nu = 1292] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 160689746
% resolvents: 118781534 factors: 41908212
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1292
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 19 [2] = 1 [5] = 2
% Total = 22
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1292 [2] = 13258831 [3] = 47614569 [4] = 62291802 [5] = 30704934 [6] = 6263794
% [7] = 534519 [8] = 20005
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [2] equalish_2 (+)1 (-)6
% [3] greater_2 (+)6 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [5] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)14 (-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 22
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 837492359
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1559239
% Number of successful unifications: 160689746
% Number of unification failures: 274840143
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 8
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 122981628
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 38312511
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 245
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 22
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 41
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.54
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 435529889
% ConstructUnitClause() = 248
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 535632
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------