TSTP Solution File: GRP130-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP130-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:28:32 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12648/GRP/GRP130-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 234] [nf = 8] [nu = 12] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 566] [nf = 430] [nu = 30] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1223] [nf = 852] [nu = 72] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3318] [nf = 4004] [nu = 114] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6429] [nf = 7156] [nu = 156] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17176] [nf = 25382] [nu = 198] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31891] [nf = 43608] [nu = 240] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 85266] [nf = 129882] [nu = 282] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 154513] [nf = 216156] [nu = 324] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 393904] [nf = 593730] [nu = 366] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 696783] [nf = 971304] [nu = 408] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1718454] [nf = 2582758] [nu = 450] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 2994077] [nf = 4194212] [nu = 492] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 34 secs [nr = 7282228] [nf = 10979138] [nu = 534] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 60 secs [nr = 12586187] [nf = 17764064] [nu = 576] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26540684] [nf = 39717927] [nu = 588] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26540859] [nf = 39717935] [nu = 606] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26541205] [nf = 39718381] [nu = 624] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26542211] [nf = 39718827] [nu = 666] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26546195] [nf = 39727769] [nu = 708] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 26562467] [nf = 39736713] [nu = 750] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 26656976] [nf = 40020088] [nu = 792] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 27570450] [nf = 40303463] [nu = 834] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 168 secs [nr = 40597846] [nf = 53232465] [nu = 876] [ut = 48]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 137602115
% resolvents: 75264065 factors: 62338050
% Number of unit clauses generated: 144893
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.11
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 39 [2] = 6 [4] = 3 [10] = 1
% Total = 49
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 144893 [2] = 49559493 [3] = 46108882 [4] = 26216208 [5] = 10416080 [6] = 4071904
% [7] = 1008238 [8] = 76417
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [2] greater_2 (+)10 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)10
% ------------------
% Total: (+)19 (-)30
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 49
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 300172063
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1552718
% Number of successful unifications: 137602115
% Number of unification failures: 428470077
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 313221872
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 21093741
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 25685018
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 144067
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 32
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 103
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.31
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 566072192
% ConstructUnitClause() = 144077
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.20 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 458674
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------